ArticleGastrointestinal endoscopy2018
Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate.
Article in Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regional Differences Exist in Gender Representation Among GI Trainees and Faculty in the United States.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Lynch syndrome integrative epidemiology and genetics (LINEAGE): rationale for cohort design.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Availability and use of computer-aided detection during colonoscopy: A real-world observational study at an Australian tertiary center.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Observational
- Evaluating quality indicators in colorectal cancer screening via fecal immunochemical tests: a five-year study from a developing country.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Physician adenoma detection rates and risk of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer in a sequential screening programme: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- Colonoscopy quality measures and adherence to follow-up guidelines among endoscopists participating in a U.S. endoscopy registry.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Article
- Exploring the influence of endoscopist characteristics and artificial intelligence on adenoma detection in colonoscopy.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Stereotype Threat and Gender Bias in Internal Medicine Residency: It is Still Hard to be in Charge.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Excellent Bowel Preparation Quality Is Not Superior to Good Bowel Preparation Quality for Improving Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Article
- The Effect of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic on Gender and Medical School Diversity in Gastroenterology Fellowship Matching.Gastro hep advances · 2024Article
- Trend of the polyp and adenoma detection rate by sex and age in asymptomatic average-risk and high-risk individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy, 2012-2019.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Usefulness of AI-Equipped Endoscopy for Detecting Colorectal Adenoma during Colonoscopy Screening: Confirm That Colon Neoplasm Finely Can Be Identified by AI without Overlooking Study (Confidential Study).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Neoplasia Diagnosis After Multi-target Stool DNA Is Enhanced Among Lowest Baseline Detectors.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Outcomes Variated by the Time of the Day: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Adenoma detection rateTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Article
- Factors associated with lesion detection in colonoscopy among different indications.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Article
- Adenoma Detection Rate on Colonoscopy: an Argument for Focused Screening?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Article
- Establishment and evaluation of a nomogram predicting risks of missed diagnoses of colorectal polyps.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- The quality of screening colonoscopy in rural and underserved areas.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPatients who receive a colonoscopy from a physician with a low adenoma detection rate (ADR) are at higher risk of subsequent colorectal cancer. It is unclear what drives the variation across physicians in ADR. We describe physician characteristics associated with higher ADR.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study a natural language processing system was used to analyze all outpatient colonoscopy examinations and their associated pathology reports from October 2013 to September 2015 for adults age 40 years and older across physicians from 4 diverse health systems. Physician performance on ADR was risk adjusted for differences in patient population and procedure indication. Our sample included 201 physicians performing at least 30 colonoscopy examinations during the study period, totaling 104,618 colonoscopy examinations.
resultsThe mean ADR was 33.2% (range, 6.3%-58.7%). Higher ADR was seen among female physicians (4.2 percentage points higher than men, P = .020), gastroenterologists (9.4 percentage points higher than nongastroenterologists, P < .001), and physicians with ≤9 years since their residency completion (6.0 percentage points higher than physicians who have had 27-51 years of practice, P = .004).
conclusionsGastroenterologists, female physicians, and more recently trained physicians had higher performance in adenoma detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.