Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28866265›Full record

ArticleRegulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP2017

Chemical-induced asthma and the role of clinical, toxicological, exposure and epidemiological research in regulatory and hazard characterization approaches.

Melissa J Vincent, Jonathan A Bernstein, David Basketter, Judy S LaKind, G Scott Dotson, Andrew Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Responses of anToxics · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Job hazards and respiratory symptoms in Hispanic female domestic cleaners.Archives of environmental & occupational health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melissa J VincentDepartment Environmental Health, University Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States. Electronic address: melissa.vincent@uc.edu.
Jonathan A BernsteinDivision of Immunology, Allergy & Rheumatology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
David BasketterDABMEB Consultancy Ltd, Sharnbrook, UK.
Judy S LaKindLaKind Associates, LLC, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland at Baltimore, School of Medicine, United States.
G Scott DotsonNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Education and Information Division, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
Andrew MaierDepartment Environmental Health, University Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncertainties in understanding all potential modes-of-action for asthma induction and elicitation hinders design of hazard characterization and risk assessment methods that adequately screen and protect against hazardous chemical exposures. To address this challenge and identify current research needs, the University of Cincinnati and the American Cleaning Institute hosted a webinar series to discuss the current state-of-science regarding chemical-induced asthma. The general consensus is that the available database, comprised of data collected from routine clinical and validated toxicological tests, is inadequate for predicting or determining causal relationships between exposures and asthma induction for most allergens. More research is needed to understand the mechanism of asthma induction and elicitation in the context of specific chemical exposures and exposure patterns, and the impact of population variability and patient phenotypes. Validated tools to predict respiratory sensitization and to translate irritancy assays to asthma potency are needed, in addition to diagnostic biomarkers that assess and differentiate allergy versus irritant-based asthmatic responses. Diagnostic methods that encompass the diverse etiologies of asthmatic responses and incorporate robust exposure measurements capable of capturing different temporal patterns of complex chemical mixtures are needed. In the absence of ideal tools, risk assessors apply hazard-based safety assessment methods, in conjunction with active risk management, to limit potential asthma concerns, proactively identify new concerns, and ensure deployment of approaches to mitigate asthma-related risks.

Indexed as

AllergensAnimalsAsthmaConsensusDisease Models, AnimalEnvironmental ExposureEpidemiologic MethodsHazardous SubstancesHumansIrritantsOccupational ExposureRisk AssessmentRisk ManagementAllergensHazardous SubstancesIrritantsAsthmaConsumer productsHazard characterizationRespiratory sensitizationRisk management

Identifiers

PMID28866265
PMCPMC5650922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.