Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28866242›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2018

To engraft or not to engraft: an ecological framework for gut microbiome modulation with live microbes.

Jens Walter, María X Maldonado-Gómez, Inés Martínez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jens WalterDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, AB, Canada; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, AB, Canada. Electronic address: jwalter1@ualberta.ca.
María X Maldonado-GómezDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis 95616, United States.
Inés MartínezDepartment of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, AB, Canada; Sacco System, Cadorago 22071, Italy.

Funding

Determination of the importance of colonization history in the assembly of the gaR01GM099525 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BENSON, ANDREW K · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
CIHRNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strategies aimed at modulating the gut microbiota by using live microbes range from single strains (probiotics or live biotherapeutics) to whole non-defined fecal transplants. Although often clinically efficacious, our understanding on how microbial-based strategies modulate gut microbiome composition and function is vastly incomplete. In this review, we present a framework based on ecological theory that provides mechanistic explanations for the findings obtained in studies that attempted to modulate the gut microbiota of humans and animals using live microbes. We argue that an ecological perspective grounded in theory is necessary to interpret and predict the impact of microbiome-modulating strategies and thus advance our ability to develop improved and targeted approaches with enhanced therapeutic efficiency.

Indexed as

EcologyGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaHumans

Identifiers

PMID28866242
PMCPMC5808858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.