Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28865991›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2017

Highly porous scaffolds of PEDOT:PSS for bone tissue engineering.

Anne Géraldine Guex, Jennifer L Puetzer, Astrid Armgarth, Elena Littmann, Eleni Stavrinidou, Emmanuel P Giannelis, George G Malliaras, Molly M Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Advances in Engineering Human Tissue Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Comparison of 2D, 3DBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. PEDOT:PSS-A Key Material for Bioelectronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Application and progress of 3D printed biomaterials in osteoporosis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anne Géraldine GuexDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom; National Lung and Heart Institute, Imperial College London, 435 Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ag.guex@gmail.com.
Jennifer L PuetzerDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.puetzer@imperial.ac.uk.
Astrid ArmgarthDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: astrid.armgarth11@imperial.ac.uk.
Elena LittmannDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: e.littmann@imperial.ac.uk.
Eleni StavrinidouDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: eleni.stavrinidou@liu.se.
Emmanuel P GiannelisMaterials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Cornell University, 176 Kimball Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, United States. Electronic address: epg2@cornell.edu.
George G MalliarasDepartment of Bioelectronics, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint Etienne, Centre Microélectronique de Provence, 880 Route de Mimet, 13541 Gardanne, France. Electronic address: malliaras@emse.fr.
Molly M StevensDepartment of Materials, Department of Bioengineering and Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.stevens@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conjugated polymers have been increasingly considered for the design of conductive materials in the field of regenerative medicine. However, optimal scaffold properties addressing the complexity of the desired tissue still need to be developed. The focus of this study lies in the development and evaluation of a conductive scaffold for bone tissue engineering. In this study PEDOT:PSS scaffolds were designed and evaluated in vitro using MC3T3-E1 osteogenic precursor cells, and the cells were assessed for distinct differentiation stages and the expression of an osteogenic phenotype. Ice-templated PEDOT:PSS scaffolds presented high pore interconnectivity with a median pore diameter of 53.6±5.9µm and a total pore surface area of 7.72±1.7m STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Tissue engineering approaches have been increasingly considered for the repair of non-union fractions, craniofacial reconstruction or large bone defect replacements. The design of complex biomaterials and successful engineering of 3-dimensional tissue constructs is of paramount importance to meet this clinical need. Conductive scaffolds, based on conjugated polymers, present interesting candidates to address the piezoelectric properties of bone tissue and to induce enhanced osteogenesis upon implantation. However, conductive scaffolds have not been investigated in vitro in great measure. To this end, we have developed a highly porous, electrically conductive scaffold based on PEDOT:PSS, and provide evidence that this purely synthetic material is a promising candidate for bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, DifferentiationBone and BonesBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCell LineGene Expression RegulationMiceOsteoblastsPolymersPorosityTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAntigens, DifferentiationBridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclicpoly(3,4-ethylene dioxythiophene)PolymersBone tissue engineeringConductive scaffoldsPEDOT:PSSPorosity

Identifiers

PMID28865991
PMCPMC5639149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.