Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28865924›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2017

Prospective, Randomized Study of Radiation Dose Escalation With Combined Proton-Photon Therapy for Benign Meningiomas.

Nina N Sanford, Beow Y Yeap, Mykol Larvie, Juliane Daartz, John E Munzenrider, Norbert J Liebsch, Barbara Fullerton, Elizabeth Pan, Jay S Loeffler, Helen A Shih

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radiotherapy for Meningioma.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nina N SanfordDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Beow Y YeapDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mykol LarvieDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Juliane DaartzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
John E MunzenriderDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Norbert J LiebschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Barbara FullertonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth PanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jay S LoefflerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Helen A ShihDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: hshih@mgh.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Statistics, Data Exchange, Management and SupportP01CA021239 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DELANEY, THOMAS F · 1985 to 2013
$28.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA021239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the outcomes of benign meningiomas (BM) treated to two radiation dose levels. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We randomly assigned patients (1:1) with incompletely resected or recurrent BM to 2 radiation doses: 55.8 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) and 63.0 Gy(RBE) of fractionated combined proton-photon radiation therapy. The primary endpoint was local control with hypothesis of improved tumor control with higher dose. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and rates of treatment-related toxicities.

resultsBetween 1991 and 2000, 47 patients were randomized. Three patients were excluded for nonbenign histology; therefore, 44 patients were analyzed: 22 who received 55.8 Gy(RBE) and 22 who received 63.0 Gy(RBE). The median follow-up was 17.1 years. Local control for the entire cohort was 98% at 10 years and 90% at 15 years. Of the 5 patients with local recurrence, 4 occurred after 10 years of follow-up, and 3 were in the lower dose group (P=.322). In the modified intention to treat analysis, there was no difference in progression-free survival (P=.234) and overall survival (P=.271) between arms. A total of 26 patients (59%) experienced a grade 2 or higher late toxicity, including 9 patients (20%) incurring a cerebrovascular accident (CVA), 7 of which were deemed at least possibly attributable to irradiation. The median time between completion of radiation therapy and CVA was 5.6 years (range, 1.4-14.0 years).

conclusionsFractionated combined proton-photon radiation therapy is effective for BM, with no apparent benefit in dose escalation. Further investigation is needed to better define the risk of late toxicities, including CVA after cranial radiation therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPhotonsProspective StudiesProton Therapy

Identifiers

PMID28865924
PMCPMC5654667
OpenAlexW2736022121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.