Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28865460›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental health : a global access science source2017

State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment.

Janet M Gray, Sharima Rasanayagam, Connie Engel, Jeanne Rizzo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 225 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ambient Air Pollution Exposure and Breast Cancer Risk Worldwide: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Changes in the fecal microbiota of breast cancer patients based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Endocrine Disruptors and Gynecological Malignancies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janet M GrayDepartment of Psychology and Program in Science, Technology, and Society, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Avenue, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12604-0246, USA. grayj@vassar.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-9161
Sharima RasanayagamBreast Cancer Prevention Partners, 1388 Sutter St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94109-5400, USA.
Connie EngelBreast Cancer Prevention Partners, 1388 Sutter St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94109-5400, USA.
Jeanne RizzoBreast Cancer Prevention Partners, 1388 Sutter St., Suite 400, San Francisco, CA, 94109-5400, USA.
Cancer Prevention Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USVassar College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this review, we examine the continually expanding and increasingly compelling data linking radiation and various chemicals in our environment to the current high incidence of breast cancer. Singly and in combination, these toxicants may have contributed significantly to the increasing rates of breast cancer observed over the past several decades. Exposures early in development from gestation through adolescence and early adulthood are particularly of concern as they re-shape the program of genetic, epigenetic and physiological processes in the developing mammary system, leading to an increased risk for developing breast cancer. In the 8 years since we last published a comprehensive review of the relevant literature, hundreds of new papers have appeared supporting this link, and in this update, the evidence on this topic is more extensive and of better quality than that previously available.

conclusionIncreasing evidence from epidemiological studies, as well as a better understanding of mechanisms linking toxicants with development of breast cancer, all reinforce the conclusion that exposures to these substances - many of which are found in common, everyday products and byproducts - may lead to increased risk of developing breast cancer. Moving forward, attention to methodological limitations, especially in relevant epidemiological and animal models, will need to be addressed to allow clearer and more direct connections to be evaluated.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureBreast NeoplasmsEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHazardous SubstancesHumansIncidenceEnvironmental PollutantsHazardous SubstancesBisphenol aBreast cancerEndocrine disrupting compoundsEnvironmental toxicantsLight-at-nightRadiation

Identifiers

PMID28865460
PMCPMC5581466
OpenAlexW2751608646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.