Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28865429›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

A new and updated resource for codon usage tables.

John Athey, Aikaterini Alexaki, Ekaterina Osipova, Alexandre Rostovtsev, Luis V Santana-Quintero, Upendra Katneni, Vahan Simonyan, Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 146 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
146citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

146 citing papers in PubMed, 329 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mitogenomic analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transfection of the free-living algabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. tRNA Modifications: A Tale of Two Viruses-SARS-CoV-2 and ZIKV.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Molecular biology of the cell · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

86 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John AtheyDivision of Plasma Protein Therapeutics, Office of Tissue and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Aikaterini AlexakiDivision of Plasma Protein Therapeutics, Office of Tissue and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Ekaterina OsipovaHigh Performance Integrated Environment, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Alexandre RostovtsevHigh Performance Integrated Environment, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Luis V Santana-QuinteroHigh Performance Integrated Environment, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Upendra KatneniDivision of Plasma Protein Therapeutics, Office of Tissue and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Vahan SimonyanHigh Performance Integrated Environment, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA.
Chava Kimchi-SarfatyDivision of Plasma Protein Therapeutics, Office of Tissue and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, USA. Chava.Kimchi-Sarfaty@fda.hhs.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9355-8585
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the degeneracy of the genetic code, most amino acids can be encoded by multiple synonymous codons. Synonymous codons naturally occur with different frequencies in different organisms. The choice of codons may affect protein expression, structure, and function. Recombinant gene technologies commonly take advantage of the former effect by implementing a technique termed codon optimization, in which codons are replaced with synonymous ones in order to increase protein expression. This technique relies on the accurate knowledge of codon usage frequencies. Accurately quantifying codon usage bias for different organisms is useful not only for codon optimization, but also for evolutionary and translation studies: phylogenetic relations of organisms, and host-pathogen co-evolution relationships, may be explored through their codon usage similarities. Furthermore, codon usage has been shown to affect protein structure and function through interfering with translation kinetics, and cotranslational protein folding.

resultsDespite the obvious need for accurate codon usage tables, currently available resources are either limited in scope, encompassing only organisms from specific domains of life, or greatly outdated. Taking advantage of the exponential growth of GenBank and the creation of NCBI's RefSeq database, we have developed a new database, the High-performance Integrated Virtual Environment-Codon Usage Tables (HIVE-CUTs), to present and analyse codon usage tables for every organism with publicly available sequencing data. Compared to existing databases, this new database is more comprehensive, addresses concerns that limited the accuracy of earlier databases, and provides several new functionalities, such as the ability to view and compare codon usage between individual organisms and across taxonomical clades, through graphical representation or through commonly used indices. In addition, it is being routinely updated to keep up with the continuous flow of new data in GenBank and RefSeq.

conclusionGiven the impact of codon usage bias on recombinant gene technologies, this database will facilitate effective development and review of recombinant drug products and will be instrumental in a wide area of biological research. The database is available at hive.biochemistry.gwu.edu/review/codon .

Indexed as

CodonDatabases, Nucleic AcidAnimalsHumansCodonCodon optimizationCodon usage biasRecombinant protein therapeuticsTranslational kinetics

Identifiers

PMID28865429
PMCPMC5581930
OpenAlexW2752631734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.