Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28865425›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2017

Silver-coated modular Megaendoprostheses in salvage revision arthroplasty after periimplant infection with extensive bone loss - a pilot study of 34 patients.

Dirk Zajonz, Undine Birke, Mohamed Ghanem, Torsten Prietzel, Christoph Josten, Andreas Roth, Johannes K M Fakler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dirk ZajonzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4818-0413
Undine BirkeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Mohamed GhanemDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Torsten PrietzelDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, HELIOS Clinic Blankenhain, Wirthstrasse 5, D-99444, Blankenhain, Germany.
Christoph JostenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas RothDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Johannes K M FaklerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany. Johannes.fakler@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHip and knee replacements in patients with bone defects after infection correlates with high rates of reinfection. In this vulnerable patient population, the prevention of reinfection is to be considered superordinate to the functionality and defect bridging. The use of silver coating of aseptic implants as an infection prophylaxis is already proven; however, the significance of these coatings in septic reimplantation of large implants is still not sufficiently investigated.

methodsIn a retrospective analysis, 34 patients who have been treated with a modular mega-endoprosthesis after a cured bone infection of the lower limb (femur or tibia) have been evaluated. One group with 14 patients (NSCG: non silver- coated group) was supplied with the non silver- coated implants: MML München- Lübeck™ modular endoprosthesis system (AQ Implants, Ahrensburg, Germany) or MUTARS® Modular Universal Tumor And Revision System (Implantcast GmbH, Buxtehude, Germany). The other group with 20 patients (SCG: silver- coated group) was supplied with the silver- coated system of MUTARS®. In addition to the clinical findings and the patients' histories, specifically the reinfection rates, the patients' mobility was assessed using the New Mobility Score (NMS, by Parker and Palmer).

resultsThe median follow-up period was 72 months, ranging from 6 to 267 months. The dropout rate was 5.8%. The reinfection rate after healed reinfection in SCG was 40% (8/20), in NSCG 57% (8/14), p = 0.34; α =0.05. The time for reinfection was, on average, 14 months (1-72 months) in SCG and 8 months (1-48 months) in the NSCG (p = 0.61; α =0.05). The two groups showed no differences in the NMS.

conclusionWith this retrospective analysis, it can be determined that the rate of reinfection of modular mega-endoprostheses on the hip and knee joint after healed periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) can be reduced by the use of silver coated implants. The time until reinfection can also be delayed by utilizing silver coated implants. Due to the low number of cases of this highly specific patient population, no statistical significance could be determined. A positive effect, however, can be assumed through the use of silver coatings in mega-endoprostheses after an infectious situation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFemurFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProsthesis-Related InfectionsReoperationRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapySilverBone defectsModular mega-endoprosthesesPeriimplant infectionReinfectionSilver-coated implants

Identifiers

PMID28865425
PMCPMC5581473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.