ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2017
Evaluating safety of thrombolysis in chronic kidney disease patients presenting with pulmonary embolism using propensity score matching.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive Value of MPV and Plasma NT-ProBNP Combined with the Simplified Geneva Scale for the Prognosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To assess the safety of thrombolytic therapy in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who present with pulmonary embolism (PE). We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database to identify patients who underwent thrombolysis for PE between 2010 and 2014. The patients were divided into two groups: (1) No CKD and (2) CKD. Patients with and without CKD were matched using 1:1 propensity score matching and a caliper width of 0.01. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and hemorrhagic events. The secondary outcomes were blood transfusions, length of stay and total hospitalization charge. Two separate, multivariate analyses were also performed to determine the predictors for primary outcomes. The No CKD group had 16,238 and CKD group had 1341 patients prior to matching. Patients with CKD were older (Median age 67 vs. 57 years; p < 0.01), male (60.6 vs. 51.8%) and had a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and prior stroke among other comorbidities. They also had significantly higher rate of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.66) and hemorrhagic events (OR 1.47) prior to matching. Post-matching, there was no difference in hospital mortality (22.9 vs. 21.8%; p = 0.51) or hemorrhagic events (3.8 vs. 3.0%; p = 0.27) between CKD and No CKD groups. Patients with CKD had a longer length of stay, but no difference in proportion of patients receiving a blood transfusion and total hospitalization charges post-matching. Multivariate analysis showed that CKD did not predict mortality (OR 0.88, 0.75-1.02; p = 0.09) or hemorrhagic events (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76-1.04; 0.13). There was no increase in rate of hospital mortality or hemorrhagic events among CKD patients who underwent thrombolysis for PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.