Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28864881›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Improving quality of life in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor following peptide receptor radionuclide therapy assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30.

Milka Marinova, Martin Mücke, Lukas Mahlberg, Markus Essler, Henning Cuhls, Lukas Radbruch, Rupert Conrad, Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Lymphopenia duringEuropean journal of hybrid imaging · 2022
    Article
  8. Role of Radioembolization in Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2022
    Review
  9. Safety of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy withJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. JCO global oncology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Quality of life in patients with midgut NET following peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Eruption of Metastatic Paraganglioma After Successful Therapy withNuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milka MarinovaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Martin MückeDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lukas MahlbergDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Markus EsslerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Henning CuhlsDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Lukas RadbruchDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Rupert ConradDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hojjat AhmadzadehfarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. hojjat.ahmadzadehfar@ukbonn.de.
University Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have proven to be appropriate neoplasms for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), as the majority of these slow-growing malignancies overexpress somatostatin receptors. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in quality of life (QoL) of patients with P-NET following PRRT.

methodsSixty-eight patients with P-NET (31 female, mean age 61.4 y) underwent PRRT: 12 with NET of grade 1, 40 of grade 2, 8 of grade 3 (grade non-available n = 8). Prior to treatment, 39 patients showed ECOG 0, 26 patients ECOG 1, and three patients ECOG 2. Clinical assessment included evaluation of QoL and symptom changes using a standardized questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and was performed at baseline and every three months following each therapy cycle up to 12 months. Primary analysis compared QoL at baseline and after the fourth treatment cycle (N = 53).

resultsUp to four treatment cycles PRRT were performed for each patient. The median cumulative administered activity was 28.2 GBq. Primary analysis revealed that compared to baseline QoL was significantly improved revealing increased global health status (p = 0.008) and social functioning (p = 0.049) at the end of the study. Furthermore, fatigue and appetite loss showed a significant improvement after the last PRRT cycle (fatigue: p = 0.029, appetite loss p = 0.015). Sub-analyses showed that QoL was improved revealing increased global health status (3 months after first, second, and third treatment cycle p = 0.048, p = 0.002, and p < 0.001, respectively), emotional functioning (3 months after first-third cycle p = 0.003, p = 0.049, and p = 0.001, respectively) and social functioning (3 months after the first and second p < 0.001, and after the third cycle p = 0.015, respectively). Furthermore, some symptoms were significantly alleviated compared with baseline: fatigue (after first-third cycle p = 0.026, p = 0.050, and p = 0.008, respectively), nausea and vomiting (after first and second cycle p = 0.006 and p = 0.001, respectively), dyspnea (after third cycle p = 0.025), appetite loss (after first-third cycle p = 0.010, p = 0.001, and p = 0.009, respectively), constipation (after first-third cycle p = 0.050, p = 0.003, and p = 0.060, respectively).

conclusionPRRT is an effective treatment of P-NET improving QoL of patients in terms of increasing global health and mitigation of physical complaints.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsPancreatic NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsSurveys and Questionnaireslutetium Lu 177 dotatateOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsRadiopharmaceuticals177Lu-DOTATATEPancreatic neuroendocrine tumorPeptide receptor radionuclide therapyQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID28864881
OpenAlexW2753723925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.