Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28864854›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2017

Time-resolved CT assessment of collaterals as imaging biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.

Elizabeth Tong, Jim Patrie, Sara Tong, Avery Evans, Patrik Michel, Ashraf Eskandari, Max Wintermark

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. No-reflow after recanalization in ischemic stroke: From pathomechanisms to therapeutic strategies.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth TongDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. liztong@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9550-8178
Jim PatrieDepartment of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Sara TongDepartment of Orthopedics, Tseung Kwan O Hospital, Tseung Kwan O, Hong Kong.
Avery EvansDepartment of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Patrik MichelDepartment of Neurology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ashraf EskandariDepartment of Neurology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Max WintermarkDepartment of Neuroradiology, Stanford Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

National Institutes of Health T32 Grant #T32EB001631RSNA Research and Education Foundation (US) RR1570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCollateral circulation plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of acute ischemic stroke and is increasingly recognized as a promising biomarker for predicting the clinical outcome. However, there is no single established grading system. We designed a novel machine-learning software that allows non-invasive, objective, and quantitative assessment of collaterals according to their vascular territories. Our goal is to investigate the prognostic and predictive value of this collateral score for the prediction of acute stroke outcome.

methodsThis is a retrospective study of 135 patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with IV TPA. An equation using this collateral score (adjusting for age, baseline NIHSS, and recanalization) was derived to predict the clinical outcome (90-day mRS). The primary analyses focused on determining the prognostic value of our newly developed collateral scores. Secondary analyses examined the interrelationships between the collateral score and other variables.

resultsThe collateral score emerged as a statistically significant prognostic biomarker for good clinical outcome (p < 0.033) among recanalized patients, but not among non-recanalized patients (p < 0.497). Our results also showed that collateral score was a predictive biomarker (p < 0.044). These results suggest that (1) patients with good collateral score derive more benefit from successful recanalization than patients with poor collateral score and (2) collateral status is inconsequential if recanalization is not achieved.

conclusionOur data results reinforce the importance of careful patient selection for recanalization therapy to avoid futile recanalization. The paucity of collaterals predicts poor clinical outcome despite recanalization. On the other hand, robust collaterals warrant consideration for recanalization therapy given the better odds of good clinical outcome.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBrain IschemiaCollateral CirculationContrast MediaFemaleHumansIohexolMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesSoftwareStrokeTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkersContrast MediaIohexolBiomarkerCollateral grading systemCT perfusionQuantitativeStroke

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.