Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28864727›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2017

Immuno-oncology Clinical Trial Design: Limitations, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Christina S Baik, Eric H Rubin, Patrick M Forde, Janice M Mehnert, Deborah Collyar, Marcus O Butler, Erica L Dixon, Laura Q M Chow

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Continuous Versus 1-Year Fixed-Duration Nivolumab in Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 153.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christina S BaikUniversity of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington. cbaik2@u.washington.edu.
Eric H RubinMerck Research Laboratories, North Wales, Pennsylvania.
Patrick M FordeThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Janice M MehnertRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Deborah CollyarPatient Advocates in Research, Danville, California.
Marcus O ButlerPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erica L DixonThe Emmes Corporation, Rockville, Maryland.
Laura Q M ChowUniversity of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
The Johns Hopkins Translational Science Team for the ET-CTNUM1CA186691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Michael A Carducci · 2014 to 2026
$21.9M
Princess Margaret Phase I Consorium (PMP1C)UM1CA186644 · NCI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI Philippe Bedard, Kevin D Courtney · 2014 to 2026
$16.6M
Wisconsin and New Jersey Alliance in Precision Experimental TherapeuticsUM1CA186716 · NCI · RBHS -CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY · PI JABBOUR, SALMA, LIU, GLENN · 2014 to 2019
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186644NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186691NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in immuno-oncology and regulatory approvals have been rapid and paradigm shifting in many difficult-to-treat malignancies. Despite immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy becoming the standard of care across multiple tumor types, there are many unanswered questions that need to be addressed before this therapeutic modality can be fully harnessed. Areas of limitations include treatment of patients not sufficiently represented in clinical trials, uncertainty of the optimal treatment dosing and duration, and lack of understanding regarding long-term immune related toxicities and atypical tumor responses. Patients such as those with autoimmune disease, chronic viral infections, limited performance status, and brain metastases were often excluded from initial trials due to concerns of safety. However, limited data suggest that some of these patients can benefit from therapy with manageable toxicities; thus, future studies should incorporate these patients to clearly define safety and efficacy. There are still controversies regarding the optimal dosing strategy that can vary from weight-based to flat dosing, with undefined treatment duration. Further elucidation of the optimal dosing approach and evaluation of predictive biomarkers should be incorporated in the design of future trials. Finally, there are long-term immune-mediated toxicities, atypical tumor responses such as pseudoprogression and endpoints unique to immuno-oncology that are not adequately captured by traditional trial designs; thus, novel study designs are needed. In this article, we discuss in detail the above challenges and propose needed areas of research for exploration and incorporation in the next generation of immuno-oncology clinical trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHumansMedical OncologyNeoplasmsResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID28864727
PMCPMC5735832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.