Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28864726›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2017

From Famine to Feast: Developing Early-Phase Combination Immunotherapy Trials Wisely.

Daphne Day, Arta M Monjazeb, Elad Sharon, S Percy Ivy, Eric H Rubin, Gary L Rosner, Marcus O Butler

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Emerging Immunotherapy Targets in Early Drug Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Challenge for Development of Valuable Immuno-oncology Biomarkers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  8. Challenges and Opportunities in Adapting Clinical Trial Design for Immunotherapies.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daphne DayDrug Development Program, Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arta M MonjazebDepartment of Radiation Oncology, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, California.
Elad SharonCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
S Percy IvyCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Eric H RubinMerck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey.
Gary L RosnerSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland.
Marcus O ButlerDrug Development Program, Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. marcus.butler@uhn.ca.

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
The Johns Hopkins Translational Science Team for the ET-CTNUM1CA186691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Michael A Carducci · 2014 to 2026
$21.9M
Princess Margaret Phase I Consorium (PMP1C)UM1CA186644 · NCI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI Philippe Bedard, Kevin D Courtney · 2014 to 2026
$16.6M
Wisconsin and New Jersey Alliance in Precision Experimental TherapeuticsUM1CA186716 · NCI · RBHS -CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY · PI JABBOUR, SALMA, LIU, GLENN · 2014 to 2019
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186644NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186691NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Not until the turn of this century has immunotherapy become a fundamental component of cancer treatment. While monotherapy with immune modulators, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, provides a subset of patients with durable clinical benefit and possible cure, combination therapy offers the potential for antitumor activity in a greater number of patients. The field of immunology has provided us with a plethora of potential molecules and pathways to target. This abundance makes it impractical to empirically test all possible combinations efficiently. We recommend that potential immunotherapy combinations be chosen based on sound rationale and available data to address the mechanisms of primary and acquired immune resistance. Novel trial designs may increase the proportion of patients receiving potentially efficacious treatments and, at the same time, better define the balance of clinical activity and safety. We believe that implementing a strategic approach in the early development of immunotherapy combinations will expedite the delivery of more effective therapies with improved safety and durable outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials as TopicCombined Modality TherapyHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal

Identifiers

PMID28864726
PMCPMC5736967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.