Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28864724›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2017

Immuno-oncology Trial Endpoints: Capturing Clinically Meaningful Activity.

Valsamo Anagnostou, Mark Yarchoan, Aaron R Hansen, Hao Wang, Franco Verde, Elad Sharon, Deborah Collyar, Laura Q M Chow, Patrick M Forde

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial Reporting in Immuno-Oncology (TRIO): An American Society of Clinical Oncology-Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Statement.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Guideline
  9. Guideline
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Challenges in the measurement and valuation of oncological treatments in Spain: recommendations and call to action.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  18. Dual-time-point [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  19. Quality of Life in CAR-T Cell Therapy.Hematology reports · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Valsamo AnagnostouThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mark YarchoanThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Aaron R HansenDivision of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre-University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Hao WangThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Franco VerdeThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elad SharonCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Deborah CollyarPatient Advocates In Research, Danville, California.
Laura Q M ChowUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Patrick M FordeThe Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. pforde1@jhmi.edu.

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM George NELSON · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
The Johns Hopkins Translational Science Team for the ET-CTNUM1CA186691 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Jan Hendrik Beumer, Michael A Carducci · 2014 to 2026
$21.9M
Wisconsin and New Jersey Alliance in Precision Experimental TherapeuticsUM1CA186716 · NCI · RBHS -CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY · PI JABBOUR, SALMA, LIU, GLENN · 2014 to 2019
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186691NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA186716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immuno-oncology (I-O) has required a shift in the established paradigm of toxicity and response assessment in clinical research. The design and interpretation of cancer clinical trials has been primarily driven by conventional toxicity and efficacy patterns observed with chemotherapy and targeted agents, which are insufficient to fully inform clinical trial design and guide therapeutic decisions in I-O. Responses to immune-targeted agents follow nonlinear dose-response and dose-toxicity kinetics mandating the development of novel response evaluation criteria. Biomarker-driven surrogate endpoints may better capture the mechanism of action and biological response to I-O agents and could be incorporated prospectively in early-phase I-O clinical trials. While overall survival remains the gold standard for evaluation of clinical efficacy of I-O agents in late-phase clinical trials, exploration of potential novel surrogate endpoints such as objective response rate and milestone survival is to be encouraged. Patient-reported outcomes should also be assessed to help redefine endpoints for I-O clinical trials and drive more efficient drug development. This paper discusses endpoints used in I-O trials to date and potential optimal endpoints for future early- and late-phase clinical development of I-O therapies.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorClinical Trials as TopicHumansImmunotherapyMedical OncologyNeoplasmsBiomarkersBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID28864724
PMCPMC5735844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.