Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28864707›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Patients' and nurses' views on providing psychological support within cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a qualitative study.

Katrina M Turner, Rachel Winder, John L Campbell, David A Richards, Manish Gandhi, Chris M Dickens, Suzanne Richards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Beyond tumor biology: nursing interventions for psychological and immune health in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cardiovascular disease and depression: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katrina M TurnerPopulation Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Rachel WinderUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.
John L CampbellUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.
David A RichardsUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-5027
Manish GandhiRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Chris M DickensUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Suzanne RichardsUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore patients' and nurses' views on the feasibility and acceptability of providing psychological care within cardiac rehabilitation services.

designIn-depth interviews analysed thematically.

participants18 patients and 7 cardiac nurses taking part in a pilot trial (CADENCE) of an enhanced psychological care intervention delivered within cardiac rehabilitation programmes by nurses to patients with symptoms of depression.

settingCardiac services based in the South West of England and the East Midlands, UK.

resultsPatients and nurses viewed psychological support as central to good cardiac rehabilitation. Patients' accounts highlighted the significant and immediate adverse effect a cardiac event can have on an individual's mental well-being. They also showed that patients valued nurses attending to both their mental and physical health, and felt this was essential to their overall recovery. Nurses were committed to providing psychological support, believed it benefited patients, and advocated for this support to be delivered within cardiac rehabilitation programmes rather than within a parallel healthcare service. However, nurses were time-constrained and found it challenging to provide psychological care within their existing workloads.

conclusionsBoth patients and nurses highly value psychological support being delivered within cardiac rehabilitation programmes but resource constraints raise barriers to implementation. Consideration, therefore, should be given to alternative forms of delivery which do not rely solely on nurses to enable patients to receive psychological support during cardiac rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISCTRN34701576.

Indexed as

AttitudeHeart DiseasesMental HealthMental Health ServicesNursesAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCardiac RehabilitationDepressionEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPractice Patterns, Nurses'cardiac rehabilitationdepressionpsychological supportqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID28864707
PMCPMC5589022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.