Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28864488›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

How does preclinical laboratory training impact physical examination skills during the first clinical year? A retrospective analysis of routinely collected objective structured clinical examination scores among the first two matriculating classes of a reformed curriculum in one Polish medical school.

Jolanta Świerszcz, Agata Stalmach-Przygoda, Marcin Kuźma, Konrad Jabłoński, Tomasz Cegielny, Agnieszka Skrzypek, Ewa Wieczorek-Surdacka, Olga Kruszelnicka, Kaja Chmura, Bernadeta Chyrchel and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jolanta ŚwierszczDepartment of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Agata Stalmach-PrzygodaDepartment of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Marcin KuźmaStudents' Scientific Group at the Second Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine in English, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Konrad JabłońskiDepartment of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Tomasz CegielnyDepartment of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Agnieszka SkrzypekDepartment of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Ewa Wieczorek-SurdackaDepartment of Nephrology, University Hospital in Cracow, Cracow, Poland.
Olga KruszelnickaDepartment of Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure, The John Paul II Hospital in Cracow, Cracow, Poland.
Kaja ChmuraDepartment of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Bernadeta ChyrchelSecond Department of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Andrzej SurdackiSecond Department of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.
Michał NowakowskiDepartment of Medical Education, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs a result of a curriculum reform launched in 2012 at our institution, preclinical training was shortened to 2 years instead of the traditional 3 years, creating additional incentives to optimise teaching methods. In accordance with the new curriculum, a semester-long preclinical module of clinical skills (CS) laboratory training takes place in the second year of study, while an introductory clinical course (ie, brief introductory clerkships) is scheduled for the Fall semester of the third year. Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are carried out at the conclusion of both the preclinical module and the introductory clinical course. Our aim was to compare the scores at physical examination stations between the first and second matriculating classes of a newly reformed curriculum on preclinical second-year OSCEs and early clinical third-year OSCEs.

designAnalysis of routinely collected data.

settingOne Polish medical school.

participantsComplete OSCE records for 462 second-year students and 445 third-year students. OUTCOME MEASURES: OSCE scores by matriculation year.

resultsIn comparison to the first class of the newly reformed curriculum, significantly higher (ie, better) OSCE scores were observed for those students who matriculated in 2013, a year after implementing the reformed curriculum. This finding was consistent for both second-year and third-year cohorts. Additionally, the magnitude of the improvement in median third-year OSCE scores was proportional to the corresponding advancement in preceding second-year preclinical OSCE scores for each of two different sets of physical examination tasks. In contrast, no significant difference was noted between the academic years in the ability to interpret laboratory data or ECG - tasks which had not been included in the second-year preclinical training.

conclusionOur results suggest the importance of preclinical training in a CS laboratory to improve students' competence in physical examination at the completion of introductory clinical clerkships during the first clinical year.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePhysical ExaminationCurriculumEducational StatusEducation, MedicalHumansPolandRetrospective StudiesSchools, Medicalbedside teachingclinical skills laboratory trainingcurriculum reformOSCEphysical examinationundergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID28864488
PMCPMC5588968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.