Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28864463›Full record

ReviewEcho research and practice2017

Screening for rheumatic heart disease: is a paradigm shift required?

L D Hunter, M Monaghan, G Lloyd, A J K Pecoraro, A F Doubell, P G Herbst

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Echo research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

L D HunterDivision of Cardiology, Tygerberg Hospital and University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa lukehunter1987@icloud.com.
M MonaghanKing's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
G LloydDepartment of Echocardiography, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
A J K PecoraroDivision of Cardiology, Tygerberg Hospital and University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
A F DoubellDivision of Cardiology, Tygerberg Hospital and University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
P G HerbstDivision of Cardiology, Tygerberg Hospital and University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZAKing's College Hospital · GBSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GBTygerberg Hospital · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This focused review presents a critical appraisal of the World Heart Federation criteria for the echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and its performance in African RHD screening programmes. It identifies various logistical and methodological problems that negatively influence the current guideline's performance. The authors explore novel RHD screening methodology that could address some of these shortcomings and if proven to be of merit, would require a paradigm shift in the approach to the echocardiographic diagnosis of subclinical RHD.

Indexed as

2D echocardiographyrheumatic heart diseasescreening

Identifiers

PMID28864463
PMCPMC5633059
OpenAlexW2752574050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.