Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28863779›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Optimization of a metatranscriptomic approach to study the lignocellulolytic potential of the higher termite gut microbiome.

Martyna Marynowska, Xavier Goux, David Sillam-Dussès, Corinne Rouland-Lefèvre, Yves Roisin, Philippe Delfosse, Magdalena Calusinska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Review on Bacterial Contribution to Lignocellulose Breakdown into Useful Bio-Products.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Deconstruction of Lignin: From Enzymes to Microorganisms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martyna MarynowskaLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 41 rue du Brill, L-4422, Belvaux, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1739-8177
Xavier GouxLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 41 rue du Brill, L-4422, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
David Sillam-DussèsInstitute of Research for Development - Sorbonne Universités, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences - Paris, U242, 32 avenue Henri Varagnat, F-93140, Bondy, France.
Corinne Rouland-LefèvreInstitute of Research for Development - Sorbonne Universités, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Sciences - Paris, U242, 32 avenue Henri Varagnat, F-93140, Bondy, France.
Yves RoisinUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, 50 Avenue F.D. Roosevelt, B-1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Philippe DelfosseLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 41 rue du Brill, L-4422, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Magdalena CalusinskaLuxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, 41 rue du Brill, L-4422, Belvaux, Luxembourg. magdalena.calusinska@list.lu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThanks to specific adaptations developed over millions of years, the efficiency of lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose decomposition of higher termite symbiotic system exceeds that of many other lignocellulose utilizing environments. Especially, the examination of its symbiotic microbes should reveal interesting carbohydrate-active enzymes, which are of primary interest for the industry. Previous metatranscriptomic reports (high-throughput mRNA sequencing) highlight the high representation and overexpression of cellulose and hemicelluloses degrading genes in the termite hindgut digestomes, indicating the potential of this technology in search for new enzymes. Nevertheless, several factors associated with the material sampling and library preparation steps make the metatranscriptomic studies of termite gut prokaryotic symbionts challenging.

methodsIn this study, we first examined the influence of the sampling strategy, including the whole termite gut and luminal fluid, on the diversity and the metatranscriptomic profiles of the higher termite gut symbiotic bacteria. Secondly, we evaluated different commercially available kits combined in two library preparative pipelines for the best bacterial mRNA enrichment strategy.

resultsWe showed that the sampling strategy did not significantly impact the generated results, both in terms of the representation of the microbes and their transcriptomic profiles. Nevertheless collecting luminal fluid reduces the co-amplification of unwanted RNA species of host origin. Furthermore, for the four studied higher termite species, the library preparative pipeline employing Ribo-Zero Gold rRNA Removal Kit "Epidemiology" in combination with Poly(A) Purist MAG kit resulted in a more efficient rRNA and poly-A-mRNAdepletion (up to 98.44% rRNA removed) than the pipeline utilizing MICROBExpress and MICROBEnrich kits. High correlation of both Ribo-Zero and MICROBExpresse depleted gene expression profiles with total non-depleted RNA-seq data has been shown for all studied samples, indicating no systematic skewing of the studied pipelines.

conclusionsWe have extensively evaluated the impact of the sampling strategy and library preparation steps on the metatranscriptomic profiles of the higher termite gut symbiotic bacteria. The presented methodological approach has great potential to enhance metatranscriptomic studies of the higher termite intestinal flora and to unravel novel carbohydrate-active enzymes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriaBacterial ProteinsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGene Expression ProfilingIsopteraLigninSymbiosisTranscription, GeneticBacterial ProteinsLigninlignocelluloseCarbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes)IsopteraMetatranscriptomicsMicrobiomemRNA enrichmentTermite gut

Identifiers

PMID28863779
PMCPMC5580439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.