ArticleThe Review of scientific instruments2017
Practical methods for generating alternating magnetic fields for biomedical research.
Article in The Review of scientific instruments, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic induction heating: where will the field go next?Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- PCB Coil Pairs for Small Magnetic Volumes.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High-power dual-channel chamber for high-frequency magnetic neuromodulation.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- Iron oxide nanoparticles in leukemia: design, diagnostic applications, and therapeutic strategies.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2025Review
- Open-source magnetic system for wireless neuromodulations in vitro and for untethered brain stimulation in vivo.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Electrospun Magnetic Nanofiber Mats for Magnetic Hyperthermia in Cancer Treatment Applications-Technology, Mechanism, and Materials.Polymers · 2023Review
- A C-shaped miniaturized coil for transcranial magnetic stimulation in rodents.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
- Modulating cell signalling in vivo with magnetic nanotransducers.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022Article
- Probing Neuro-Endocrine Interactions Through Remote Magnetothermal Adrenal Stimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Magnetothermal nanoparticle technology alleviates parkinsonian-like symptoms in mice.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Magnetothermal Multiplexing for Selective Remote Control of Cell Signaling.Advanced functional materials · 2020Article
- Transgene-free remote magnetothermal regulation of adrenal hormones.Science advances · 2020Article
- Nanoscale Heat Transfer from Magnetic Nanoparticles and Ferritin in an Alternating Magnetic Field.Biophysical journal · 2020Article
- Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Disease Detection and Therapy.Materials today (Kidlington, England) · 2019Article
- Remotely controlled chemomagnetic modulation of targeted neural circuits.Nature nanotechnology · 2019Article
- Magnetic Strategies for Nervous System Control.Annual review of neuroscience · 2019Review
- Magnetic Entropy as a Proposed Gating Mechanism for Magnetogenetic Ion Channels.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Transient Magnetothermal Neuronal Silencing Using the Chloride Channel Anoctamin 1 (TMEM16A).Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alternating magnetic fields (AMFs) cause magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) to dissipate heat while leaving surrounding tissue unharmed, a mechanism that serves as the basis for a variety of emerging biomedical technologies. Unfortunately, the challenges and costs of developing experimental setups commonly used to produce AMFs with suitable field amplitudes and frequencies present a barrier to researchers. This paper first presents a simple, cost-effective, and robust alternative for small AMF working volumes that uses soft ferromagnetic cores to focus the flux into a gap. As the experimental length scale increases to accommodate animal models (working volumes of 100s of cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.