ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2017
Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Structural Equation Approach to Characterizing Growth and Nonlinearity Underlying Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- The Ins and Outs of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Growth: A Review.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Review
- Detection of mild sensory hearing loss using a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- The Origin Along the Cochlea of Otoacoustic Emissions Evoked by Mid-Frequency Tone Pips.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Article
- Measurement of swept level distortion product otoacoustic emission growth functions at multiple frequencies simultaneously.JASA express letters · 2023Article
- The Remarkable Outer Hair Cell: Proceedings of a Symposium in Honour of W. E. Brownell.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023Review
- Characterizing the Relationship Between Reflection and Distortion Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission two-tone suppression in humans.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Characteristic of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions: Detection Rate, Musical Training Influence, and Gain Function.Brain sciences · 2019Article
- Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2018Article
- Efferent-induced alterations in distortion and reflection otoacoustic emissions in children.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Swept-tone stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions: Normative data and methodological considerations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Article
- Article
- Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Reflect Audiometric Patterns of Age-Related Hearing Loss.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) provide salient information about cochlear function and dysfunction. Two broad classes of emissions, linear reflection and nonlinear distortion, arise via distinct cochlear processes and hence, appear to provide independent information about cochlear health and hearing. Considered in combination, these two OAE types may characterize sensory hearing loss most effectively. In this study, the level-dependent growth of stimulus-frequency OAEs (a reflection-type emission) and distortion-product OAEs (a distortion-type emission) were measured in ten normal-hearing ears and eight ears with slight-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Metrics of OAE strength and compression were derived from OAE input/output functions and then considered in a combined fashion. Results indicate that SFOAEs and DPOAEs differ significantly in their strength and compression features. When SFOAE and DPOAE metrics are displayed together on a two-dimensional plot, relatively well-defined data clusters describe their normative relationship. In hearing-impaired ears, this relationship is disrupted but not in a uniform way across ears; ears with similar audiograms showed differently altered joint-OAE profiles. Hearing loss sometimes affected only one OAE or one more than the other. Results suggest a joint-OAE profile is promising and warrants study in a large group of subjects with sensory hearing loss of varied etiologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.