Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28863143›Full record

Observational studyPLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Genotypic characterization directly applied to sputum improves the detection of Mycobacterium africanum West African 1, under-represented in positive cultures.

C N'Dira Sanoussi, Dissou Affolabi, Leen Rigouts, Séverin Anagonou, Bouke de Jong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02744469 (Implications of the Population Structure of the Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex in Benin for Tuberculosis Presentation, Diagnosis and Outcome), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02744469 completednot on this map

Implications of the Population Structure of the Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex in Benin for Tuberculosis Presentation, Diagnosis and Outcome

TypeobservationalSponsorLaboratoire de Référence des MycobactériesRan2016 to 2019Enrolled1,490ConditionsTuberculosisArmsNo intervention (observational study)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. TheeLife · 2025
    Article
  3. Evidence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Insights into the Complexity of a DormantMicrobiology spectrum · 2022
    Article
  9. Microbial genomics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C N'Dira SanoussiMycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-574X
Dissou AffolabiLaboratoire de Référence des Mycobactéries, Centre National Hospitalier Universitaire de Pneumo-Phtisiologie de Cotonou, National Tuberculosis Programme, Cotonou, Benin.
Leen RigoutsMycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Séverin AnagonouLaboratoire de Référence des Mycobactéries, Centre National Hospitalier Universitaire de Pneumo-Phtisiologie de Cotonou, National Tuberculosis Programme, Cotonou, Benin.
Bouke de JongMycobacteriology Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to compare the prevalence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBc) lineages between direct genotyping (on sputum) and indirect genotyping (on culture), to characterize potential culture bias against difficult growers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsSmear-positive sputa from consecutive new tuberculosis patients diagnosed in Cotonou, (Benin) were included, before patients had started treatment. An aliquot of decontaminated sputum was used for direct spoligotyping, and another aliquot was cultured on Löwenstein Jensen (LJ) medium (90 days), for indirect spoligotyping. After DNA extraction, spoligotyping was done according to the standard method for all specimens, and patterns obtained from sputa were compared versus those from the derived culture isolates. From 199 patient's sputa, 146 (73.4%) yielded a positive culture. In total, direct spoligotyping yielded a pattern in 98.5% (196/199) of the specimens, versus 73.4% (146/199) for indirect spoligotyping on cultures. There was good agreement between sputum- and isolate derived patterns: 94.4% (135/143) at spoligotype level and 96.5% (138/143) at (sub)lineage level. Two of the 8 pairs with discrepant pattern were suggestive of mixed infection in sputum. Ancestral lineages (Lineage 1, and M. africanum Lineages 5 and 6) were less likely to grow in culture (OR = 0.30, 95%CI (0.14 to 0.64), p = 0.0016); especially Lineage 5 (OR = 0.37 95%CI (0.17 to 0.79), p = 0.010). Among modern lineages, Lineage 4 was over-represented in positive-culture specimens (OR = 3.01, 95%CI (1.4 to 6.51), p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS/ SIGNIFICANCE: Ancestral lineages, especially M. africanum West African 1 (Lineage 5), are less likely to grow in culture relative to modern lineages, especially M. tuberculosis Euro-American (Lineage 4). Direct spoligotyping on smear positive sputum is effective and efficient compared to indirect spoligotyping of cultures. It allows for a more accurate unbiased determination of the population structure of the M. tuberculosis complex.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02744469.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacterial Typing TechniquesBeninDNA, BacterialFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesSputumDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID28863143
PMCPMC5599059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.