Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28863138›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

5C analysis of the Epidermal Differentiation Complex locus reveals distinct chromatin interaction networks between gene-rich and gene-poor TADs in skin epithelial cells.

Krzysztof Poterlowicz, Joanne L Yarker, Igor Malashchuk, Brian R Lajoie, Andrei N Mardaryev, Michal R Gdula, Andrey A Sharov, Terumi Kohwi-Shigematsu, Vladimir A Botchkarev, Michael Y Fessing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Chromatin Landscape Governing Murine Epidermal Differentiation.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Granger causal inference on DAGs identifies genomic loci regulating transcription.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Krzysztof PoterlowiczCentre for Skin Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6173-5674
Joanne L YarkerCentre for Skin Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Igor MalashchukCentre for Skin Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Brian R LajoieProgram in Systems Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Andrei N MardaryevCentre for Skin Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
Michal R GdulaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andrey A SharovDepartment of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Terumi Kohwi-ShigematsuDepartment of Orofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Vladimir A BotchkarevCentre for Skin Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-5353
Michael Y FessingCentre for Skin Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.
University of Bradford · GBBoston University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Studies on gene regulation by chromatin organizationR37CA039681 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KOHWI-SHIGEMATSU, TERUMI · 2002 to 2015
$9.8M
Epigenetic regulation of skin development and keratinocyte differentiationR01AR064580 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BOTCHKAREV, VLADIMIR A, KOHWI-SHIGEMATSU, TERUMI · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
Chromatin architectural protein CTCF and regulation of skin development and tumorigenesisR01AR071727 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI BOTCHKAREV, VLADIMIR A, KOHWI-SHIGEMATSU, TERUMI · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
Medical Research Council MR/M010015/1Medical Research Council MR/N009630/1NCI NIH HHS R37 CA039681NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR064580NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR071727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian genomes contain several dozens of large (>0.5 Mbp) lineage-specific gene loci harbouring functionally related genes. However, spatial chromatin folding, organization of the enhancer-promoter networks and their relevance to Topologically Associating Domains (TADs) in these loci remain poorly understood. TADs are principle units of the genome folding and represents the DNA regions within which DNA interacts more frequently and less frequently across the TAD boundary. Here, we used Chromatin Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C) technology to characterize spatial chromatin interaction network in the 3.1 Mb Epidermal Differentiation Complex (EDC) locus harbouring 61 functionally related genes that show lineage-specific activation during terminal keratinocyte differentiation in the epidermis. 5C data validated by 3D-FISH demonstrate that the EDC locus is organized into several TADs showing distinct lineage-specific chromatin interaction networks based on their transcription activity and the gene-rich or gene-poor status. Correlation of the 5C results with genome-wide studies for enhancer-specific histone modifications (H3K4me1 and H3K27ac) revealed that the majority of spatial chromatin interactions that involves the gene-rich TADs at the EDC locus in keratinocytes include both intra- and inter-TAD interaction networks, connecting gene promoters and enhancers. Compared to thymocytes in which the EDC locus is mostly transcriptionally inactive, these interactions were found to be keratinocyte-specific. In keratinocytes, the promoter-enhancer anchoring regions in the gene-rich transcriptionally active TADs are enriched for the binding of chromatin architectural proteins CTCF, Rad21 and chromatin remodeler Brg1. In contrast to gene-rich TADs, gene-poor TADs show preferential spatial contacts with each other, do not contain active enhancers and show decreased binding of CTCF, Rad21 and Brg1 in keratinocytes. Thus, spatial interactions between gene promoters and enhancers at the multi-TAD EDC locus in skin epithelial cells are cell type-specific and involve extensive contacts within TADs as well as between different gene-rich TADs, forming the framework for lineage-specific transcription.

Indexed as

AnimalsCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Cycle ProteinsCell DifferentiationChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpidermisEpigenesis, GeneticGenomeKeratinocytesMiceNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinCtcf protein, mouseDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsRad21 protein, mouseRepressor ProteinsSmarca4 protein, mouseTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28863138
PMCPMC5599062
OpenAlexW2752613955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.