Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28862948›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2017

Improving Outcomes of Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest After Implementation of International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation 2010 Consensus: A Nationwide Prospective Observational Population-Based Study.

Hidehiro Kaneko, Masahiko Hara, Kazuki Mizutani, Minoru Yoshiyama, Kensuke Yokoi, Daijiro Kabata, Ayumi Shintani, Tetsuhisa Kitamura

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Telephone CPR: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2020
    Review
  6. Polish Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) Response to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA): A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hidehiro KanekoDepartment of Cardiology, Medical School Brandenburg, Bernau bei Berlin, Brandenburg, Germany.
Masahiko HaraDepartment of Medical Innovation, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan masahiko.hara@dmi.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Kazuki MizutaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Minoru YoshiyamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Kensuke YokoiCardiovascular Division, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Daijiro KabataDepartment of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Ayumi ShintaniDepartment of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Tetsuhisa KitamuraDivision of Environmental Medicine and Population Sciences, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) periodically updates the consensus recommendations for cardiopulmonary resuscitation to improve the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, little is known about the differences in outcomes of witnessed OHCA following the publication of the ILCOR 2010 and the ILCOR 2005 recommendations. METHODS AND

resultsWe enrolled 241 990 adults who experienced witnessed OHCA between 2007 and 2013 from a prospective, nation-wide, population-based cohort database in Japan. We compared neurologically favorable 1-month survival and 1-month survival rates post-OHCA by dividing the study period into 2 categories: the ILCOR 2005 period and ILCOR 2010 period. The associations between guideline periods and outcomes were estimated using multivariable logistic regression analysis and reported as adjusted odds ratio and 95% CI. Among 241 990 patients examined in this study, OHCA was witnessed in 44 706 patients (18%) by emergency medical service personnel and in 197 284 patients (82%) by citizens. Compared with the ILCOR 2005 period, the neurologically favorable 1-month survival rate improved from 4.6% to 5.2% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.42-1.67;

conclusionsOutcomes of witnessed OHCA were better in the ILCOR 2010 period than those in the ILCOR 2005 period. Our results can provide baseline data for many future prospective studies.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationOutcome Assessment, Health CareOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overChi-Square DistributionConsensus Statements as TopicDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInternational CooperationJapanLogistic ModelsMalecardiopulmonary resuscitationInternational Liaison Committee on Resuscitationout‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID28862948
PMCPMC5586403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.