Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2017
Improving Outcomes of Witnessed Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest After Implementation of International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation 2010 Consensus: A Nationwide Prospective Observational Population-Based Study.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Neurologic outcome and location of cardiac arrest in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A multicentre retrospective cohort in Japan.Resuscitation plus · 2023Article
- Delayed administration of epinephrine is associated with worse neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and initial pulseless electrical activity: insight from the nationwide multicentre observational JAAM-OHCA (Japan Association for Acute Medicine) registry.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2022Article
- Circular RNAs in Sudden Cardiac Death Related Diseases: Novel Biomarker for Clinical and Forensic Diagnosis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Telephone CPR: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2020Review
- Polish Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) Response to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA): A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- Improvement of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rate after implementation of the 2010 resuscitation guidelines.PloS one · 2018Observational
- International Collaboration With Dedicated Local Implementation Improves Survival From Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) periodically updates the consensus recommendations for cardiopulmonary resuscitation to improve the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, little is known about the differences in outcomes of witnessed OHCA following the publication of the ILCOR 2010 and the ILCOR 2005 recommendations. METHODS AND
resultsWe enrolled 241 990 adults who experienced witnessed OHCA between 2007 and 2013 from a prospective, nation-wide, population-based cohort database in Japan. We compared neurologically favorable 1-month survival and 1-month survival rates post-OHCA by dividing the study period into 2 categories: the ILCOR 2005 period and ILCOR 2010 period. The associations between guideline periods and outcomes were estimated using multivariable logistic regression analysis and reported as adjusted odds ratio and 95% CI. Among 241 990 patients examined in this study, OHCA was witnessed in 44 706 patients (18%) by emergency medical service personnel and in 197 284 patients (82%) by citizens. Compared with the ILCOR 2005 period, the neurologically favorable 1-month survival rate improved from 4.6% to 5.2% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.42-1.67;
conclusionsOutcomes of witnessed OHCA were better in the ILCOR 2010 period than those in the ILCOR 2005 period. Our results can provide baseline data for many future prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.