Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28862924›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of social psychology2018

Sex differences in jealousy: the (lack of) influence of researcher theoretical perspective.

John Edlund, Jeremy D Heider, Austin Lee Nichols, Randy J McCarthy, Sarah E Wood, Cory R Scherer, Jessica L Hartnett, Richard Walker

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of social psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

John Edlunda Rochester Institute of Technology.
Jeremy D Heiderb Southeastern Missouri State University.
Austin Lee Nicholsc Luxembourg School of Business and the Zagreb School of Economics and Management.
Randy J McCarthyd Northern Illinois University.
Sarah E Woode University of Wisconsin, Stout.
Cory R Schererf Pennsylvania State University, Schuylkill.
Jessica L Hartnettg Gannon University.
Richard Walkerh Colorado State University, Pueblo.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sex difference in jealousy is an effect that has generated significant controversy in the academic literature (resulting in two meta-analyses that reached different conclusions on the presence or absence of the effect). In this study, we had a team of researchers from different theoretical perspectives use identical protocols to test whether the sex difference in jealousy would occur across many different samples (while testing whether mate value would moderate the effect). In our samples, we found the sex difference in jealousy to occur using both forced choice and continuous measures, this effect appeared in several different settings, and, we found that mate value moderated participant responses. The results are discussed in light of the controversy surrounding the presence of the effect.

Indexed as

JealousySex CharacteristicsAdultFemaleHumansMaleSexual PartnersJealousymate valuesex differences

Identifiers

PMID28862924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.