Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28862330›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2017

Defining the neural fulcrum for chronic vagus nerve stimulation: implications for integrated cardiac control.

Jeffrey L Ardell, Heath Nier, Matthew Hammer, E Marie Southerland, Christopher L Ardell, Eric Beaumont, Bruce H KenKnight, J Andrew Armour

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Autonomic Neuromodulation Acutely Ameliorates Left Ventricular Strain in Humans.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2019
    Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Single-Electrode, Bidirectional Control of Heart Rate via Vagus Nerve Modulation in Rat Model.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cardiac vagal motor neurons.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey L ArdellUCLA Neurocardiology Research Center of Excellence and UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9241-0864
Heath NierBiomedical Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Matthew HammerUCLA Neurocardiology Research Center of Excellence and UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
E Marie SoutherlandBiomedical Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Christopher L ArdellBiomedical Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Eric BeaumontBiomedical Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2907-7768
Bruce H KenKnightNew Ventures, LivaNova plc, Houston, TX, USA.
J Andrew ArmourUCLA Neurocardiology Research Center of Excellence and UCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
East Tennessee State University · USUCLA Health · USLivaNova (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsThe evoked cardiac response to bipolar cervical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) reflects a dynamic interaction between afferent mediated decreases in central parasympathetic drive and suppressive effects evoked by direct stimulation of parasympathetic efferent axons to the heart. The neural fulcrum is defined as the operating point, based on frequency-amplitude-pulse width, where a null heart rate response is reproducibly evoked during the on-phase of VNS. Cardiac control, based on the principal of the neural fulcrum, can be elicited from either vagus. Beta-receptor blockade does not alter the tachycardia phase to low intensity VNS, but can increase the bradycardia to higher intensity VNS. While muscarinic cholinergic blockade prevented the VNS-induced bradycardia, clinically relevant doses of ACE inhibitors, beta-blockade and the funny channel blocker ivabradine did not alter the VNS chronotropic response. While there are qualitative differences in VNS heart control between awake and anaesthetized states, the physiological expression of the neural fulcrum is maintained. ABSTRACT: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an emerging therapy for treatment of chronic heart failure and remains a standard of therapy in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy. The objective of this work was to characterize heart rate (HR) responses (HRRs) during the active phase of chronic VNS over a wide range of stimulation parameters in order to define optimal protocols for bidirectional bioelectronic control of the heart. In normal canines, bipolar electrodes were chronically implanted on the cervical vagosympathetic trunk bilaterally with anode cephalad to cathode (n = 8, 'cardiac' configuration) or with electrode positions reversed (n = 8, 'epilepsy' configuration). In awake state, HRRs were determined for each combination of pulse frequency (2-20 Hz), intensity (0-3.5 mA) and pulse widths (130-750 μs) over 14 months. At low intensities and higher frequency VNS, HR increased during the VNS active phase owing to afferent modulation of parasympathetic central drive. When functional effects of afferent and efferent fibre activation were balanced, a null HRR was evoked (defined as 'neural fulcrum') during which HRR ≈ 0. As intensity increased further, HR was reduced during the active phase of VNS. While qualitatively similar, VNS delivered in the epilepsy configuration resulted in more pronounced HR acceleration and reduced HR deceleration during VNS. At termination, under anaesthesia, transection of the vagi rostral to the stimulation site eliminated the augmenting response to VNS and enhanced the parasympathetic efferent-mediated suppressing effect on electrical and mechanical function of the heart. In conclusion, VNS activates central then peripheral aspects of the cardiac nervous system. VNS control over cardiac function is maintained during chronic therapy.

Indexed as

Heart RateVagus Nerve StimulationAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAnimalsBenzazepinesDogsFemaleHeartIvabradineMaleMuscarinic AntagonistsVagus NerveAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBenzazepinesIvabradineMuscarinic Antagonistscardiac afferentneural fulcrumneurocardiologyparasympatheticvagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID28862330
PMCPMC5685838
OpenAlexW2752489571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.