ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2017
Typical & atypical enteropathogenic
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Virulence genes, antimicrobial resistance profiles and phylogroups of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from dairy cattle in South Africa.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
objectivesMultidrug-resistant enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) is responsible for a large number of cases of infantile diarrhoea in developing countries, causing failure in treatment with consequent health burden and resulting in a large number of deaths every year. This study was undertaken to determine the proportion of typical and atypical EPEC in under five children with diarrhoea and controls, their function as a carriage and to identify virulent genes associated with them.
methodsDuring the study period, 120 stool samples including 80 from controls children were collected and analyzed for the presence of EPEC using standard bacteriological methods. Isolates were subjected to antimicrobial testing by disc diffusion method. Isolates confirmed as E. coli by phenotypic method were further tested for the presence of attaching and effacing (eae) and bundle-forming pilus (bfpA) genes by real-time SYBR Green-based polymerase chain reaction.
resultsAll isolates were tested for the presence of EPEC. The frequency of typical EPEC was 20 and 16.25 per cent whereas the frequency of atypical EPEC strains was 5 and 23.75 per cent in patients and controls, respectively (PbfpA was seen in 45 and 18.75 per cent isolates of diarrhoeal patients and controls, respectively. INTERPRETATION &
conclusionsOur results showed that typical EPEC was a common cause of diarrhoea, but at the same time, atypical EPEC was emerging as colonizers in the intestine of children with and without diarrhoea in and around Delhi. Children can be considered asymptomatic carriers of these pathogens and can transmit them to other susceptible children. Adequate steps need to be taken to stop these strains from developing and spreading further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.