Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28861902›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2017

Age effects in eating disorder baseline risk factors and prevention intervention effects.

Paul Rohde, Eric Stice, Heather Shaw, Jeff M Gau, Olivia C Ohls

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul RohdeOregon Research Institute, Eugene, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-6869-6513
Eric SticeOregon Research Institute, Eugene, Oregon.
Heather ShawOregon Research Institute, Eugene, Oregon.
Jeff M GauOregon Research Institute, Eugene, Oregon.
Olivia C OhlsOregon Research Institute, Eugene, Oregon.

Funding

Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention: Clinician-Led, Peer-Led, vs Web-Delivered R01MH097720 · NIMH · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STICE, ERIC M · 2013 to 2017
$4.2M
Effectiveness Trial of a Dissonance-Based Obesity Prevention ProgramR01HD071900 · NICHD · OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STICE, ERIC M · 2012 to 2016
$2.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071900NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH097720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExamine the impact of age on baseline eating disorder symptoms/risk factors and on the effects of completing three variants of an eating disorder prevention program.

methodSix hundred and eighty women (60% White) were randomized to clinician-led Body Project groups, peer-led Body Project groups, an Internet-based version of the Body Project (eBodyProject), or educational video control condition. Participants, who were on average 22.2 years old (SD = 7.1, range 17-64, median = 19), were assessed at pretest, posttest, and 6-month follow-up.

resultsTwo of the seven baseline variables were significantly associated with age, indicating that older age was associated with lower reported dieting (r = -.12) and better psychosocial functioning (r = -.13). Interactions indicated that age moderated the intervention effects, such that group-based programs were superior to the Internet-delivered version in terms of eating disorder symptom reductions for women up to age 20, whereas the Internet-delivered program was superior to group-based interventions, particularly in terms of BMI reduction, for women over approximately age 25. None of the four tests examining whether age moderated the effects of delivering Body Project groups by mental health clinicians versus undergraduate peer educators were significant. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that group-based versions of the Body Project should be implemented with young women up to the age of 20, as they produce larger eating disorder symptom reductions, whereas the Internet version of the Body Project should be implemented with women aged 25 or older, as it produces superior weight loss/gain prevention effects.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsBody ImageFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultageeating disordersmoderationobesityprevention

Identifiers

PMID28861902
PMCPMC5745064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.