Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28861756›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2017

Management of Supraventricular Tachycardia in Infants.

Chalese Richardson, Eric S Silver

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Practical compendium of antiarrhythmic drugs: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Management of acute supraventricular tachycardia in children.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Paediatric Life Support].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chalese RichardsonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center/Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York Presbyterian, 3959 Broadway 2 North, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Eric S SilverDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center/Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York Presbyterian, 3959 Broadway 2 North, New York, NY, 10032, USA. es2301@columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USMorgan Stanley Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supraventricular tachycardia is the most common tachyarrhythmia encountered in infants. In older children and adults, definitive treatment of the supraventricular tachycardia substrate with catheter ablation is a common approach to management. However, in infants, the risks of catheter ablation are significantly higher, and the patients often outgrow the potential to experience episodes. Therefore, antiarrhythmic medications are often utilized to minimize the likelihood of experiencing episodes. This article reviews the common arrhythmia mechanisms encountered in infants and the medications used to treat these patients.

Indexed as

Anti-Arrhythmia AgentsHumansInfantTachycardia, SupraventricularAnti-Arrhythmia Agents

Identifiers

PMID28861756
OpenAlexW2752084898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.