Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28861630›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2018

An integrated inverse model-experimental approach to determine soft tissue three-dimensional constitutive parameters: application to post-infarcted myocardium.

Reza Avazmohammadi, David S Li, Thomas Leahy, Elizabeth Shih, João S Soares, Joseph H Gorman, Robert C Gorman, Michael S Sacks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A novel diffusion tensor based three-dimensional constitutive model for human breast tissue.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Image-Based Estimation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Stiffness.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Reza AvazmohammadiCenter for Cardiovascular Simulation, Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 East 24th St, Stop C0200, Austin, Texas, 78712-1229, USA.
David S LiCenter for Cardiovascular Simulation, Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 East 24th St, Stop C0200, Austin, Texas, 78712-1229, USA.
Thomas LeahyCenter for Cardiovascular Simulation, Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 East 24th St, Stop C0200, Austin, Texas, 78712-1229, USA.
Elizabeth ShihCenter for Cardiovascular Simulation, Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 East 24th St, Stop C0200, Austin, Texas, 78712-1229, USA.
João S SoaresCenter for Cardiovascular Simulation, Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 East 24th St, Stop C0200, Austin, Texas, 78712-1229, USA.
Joseph H GormanGorman Cardiovascular Research Group, Smilow Center for Translational Research, 3400 Civic Center Blvd - Building 421 11th Floor, Room 112, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-5156, USA.
Robert C GormanGorman Cardiovascular Research Group, Smilow Center for Translational Research, 3400 Civic Center Blvd - Building 421 11th Floor, Room 112, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-5156, USA.
Michael S SacksCenter for Cardiovascular Simulation, Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 201 East 24th St, Stop C0200, Austin, Texas, 78712-1229, USA. msacks@ices.utexas.edu.

Funding

Surgery to Prevent Post Infarction Ventricular RemodelingR01HL063954 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GORMAN, ROBERT C · 2001 to 2018
$9.8M
Echocardiography to Predict Recurrent IMR After Surgical Mitral Valve ReplacementR01HL103723 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GORMAN, ROBERT C, HUNG, JUDY W · 2011 to 2020
$5.3M
Comprehensive Training Program in Imaging Science and InformaticsT32EB007507 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARKEY, MIA K, RYLANDER, HENRY GRADY · 2009 to 2024
$2.7M
Adaptive remodeling of the right ventricle in response to pulmonary hypertension: towards physical understanding and predictionF32HL132543 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI AVAZMOHAMMADI, REZA · 2016 to 2018
$125k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL132543NHLBI NIH HHS HL063954NHLBI NIH HHS HL132543NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103723NIBIB NIH HHS EB007507NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB007507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the complete three-dimensional (3D) mechanical behavior of soft tissues is essential in understanding their pathophysiology and in developing novel therapies. Despite significant progress made in experimentation and modeling, a complete approach for the full characterization of soft tissue 3D behavior remains elusive. A major challenge is the complex architecture of soft tissues, such as myocardium, which endows them with strongly anisotropic and heterogeneous mechanical properties. Available experimental approaches for quantifying the 3D mechanical behavior of myocardium are limited to preselected planar biaxial and 3D cuboidal shear tests. These approaches fall short in pursuing a model-driven approach that operates over the full kinematic space. To address these limitations, we took the following approach. First, based on a kinematical analysis and using a given strain energy density function (SEDF), we obtained an optimal set of displacement paths based on the full 3D deformation gradient tensor. We then applied this optimal set to obtain novel experimental data from a 1-cm cube of post-infarcted left ventricular myocardium. Next, we developed an inverse finite element (FE) simulation of the experimental configuration embedded in a parameter optimization scheme for estimation of the SEDF parameters. Notable features of this approach include: (i) enhanced determinability and predictive capability of the estimated parameters following an optimal design of experiments, (ii) accurate simulation of the experimental setup and transmural variation of local fiber directions in the FE environment, and (iii) application of all displacement paths to a single specimen to minimize testing time so that tissue viability could be maintained. Our results indicated that, in contrast to the common approach of conducting preselected tests and choosing an SEDF a posteriori, the optimal design of experiments, integrated with a chosen SEDF and full 3D kinematics, leads to a more robust characterization of the mechanical behavior of myocardium and higher predictive capabilities of the SEDF. The methodology proposed and demonstrated herein will ultimately provide a means to reliably predict tissue-level behaviors, thus facilitating organ-level simulations for efficient diagnosis and evaluation of potential treatments. While applied to myocardium, such developments are also applicable to characterization of other types of soft tissues.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalModels, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationElastomersFinite Element AnalysisMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumReproducibility of ResultsSheepWeight-BearingElastomersCardiac mechanicsConstitutive modelsInverse modelingMyocardiumOptimal design of experimentsSoft tissue mechanics

Identifiers

PMID28861630
PMCPMC5809201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.