Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28861619›Full record

Trial reportParasitology research2017

Efficacy and economic analysis of two treatment regimens using toltrazuril in lambs naturally infected with Eimeria spp. on pasture.

Fernando de Souza Rodrigues, Alfredo Skrebsky Cezar, Fernanda Rezer de Menezes, Luis Antônio Sangioni, Fernanda Silveira Flores Vogel, Sônia de Avila Botton

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Parasitology research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring the interplay betweenThe veterinary quarterly · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fernando de Souza RodriguesLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias (LADOPAR), Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva (DMVP), Centro de Ciências Rurais (CCR), Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária (PPGMV), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Av. Roraima 1000, prédio 44, sala 5139, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.
Alfredo Skrebsky CezarPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Economia e Desenvolvimento, UFSM, Rua Mal. Floriano Peixoto 1750, Santa Maria, RS, 97015-372, Brazil.
Fernanda Rezer de MenezesInstituto Federal Farroupilha, Campus São Vicente do Sul, Eixo de Gestão e Negócios, São Vicente do Sul, RS, Brazil.
Luis Antônio SangioniLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias (LADOPAR), Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva (DMVP), Centro de Ciências Rurais (CCR), Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária (PPGMV), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Av. Roraima 1000, prédio 44, sala 5139, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.
Fernanda Silveira Flores VogelLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias (LADOPAR), Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva (DMVP), Centro de Ciências Rurais (CCR), Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária (PPGMV), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Av. Roraima 1000, prédio 44, sala 5139, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil.
Sônia de Avila BottonLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias (LADOPAR), Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva (DMVP), Centro de Ciências Rurais (CCR), Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária (PPGMV), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Av. Roraima 1000, prédio 44, sala 5139, Santa Maria, RS, 97105-900, Brazil. sabott20@gmail.com.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRInstituto Federal Farroupilha · BRUniversidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy and the economic viability of two anticoccidial treatment regimens tested in lambs naturally exposed to Eimeria spp. re-infections in a grazing system during a 140-day period. Twenty-four suckling lambs were distributed into three groups based on the individual count of oocysts per gram of feces (OPG) and body weight. Animals were treated with toltrazuril 5% (20 mg/kg) at 14- (GI) or 21-day (GII) intervals, and GIII was kept as untreated control. A cost-benefit analysis of each treatment regimen was calculated. Additionally, economic analysis was performed on four hypothetical scenarios, in which lambs could be having 10, 25, 50, or 85% decrease in their expected body weight gain due to clinical. Efficacy of toltrazuril against Eimeria spp. was 96.9-99.9% (GI) and 74.2-99.9% (GII). E. ovinoidalis was most frequently identified, but no clinical signs of coccidiosis were observed in lambs. There were no differences in weight gain among the groups. The cost of treatment per lamb was $13.09 (GI) and $7.83 (GII). The estimation model showed that the cost-benefit ratio favored treatment with toltrazuril when lambs fail to gain weight. In the studied flock, the break-even point for toltrazuril administered at 14-day intervals was reached with 85% decrease in mean weight gain. In conclusion, toltrazuril can be used at 14-day intervals to control Eimeria spp. (re)-infection in lambs raised on pasture. This treatment regimen was not economically feasible for subclinical coccidiosis; however, it may be feasible when used to prevent weight loss caused by clinical coccidiosis.

Indexed as

EimeriaAdministration, OralAnimalsCoccidiosisCoccidiostatsCost-Benefit AnalysisFecesFemaleMaleOocystsSheepSheep DiseasesTriazinesWeight GainCoccidiostatstoltrazurilTriazinesAnticoccidialCoccidiaCoccidiosisEimeriosisSheepToltrazuril

Identifiers

PMID28861619
OpenAlexW2750654052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.