Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28861603›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2017

Pleasantness of olfactory and trigeminal stimulants in different Italian regions.

Elena Cantone, Andrea Ciofalo, Jan Vodicka, Valentina Iacono, Ioannis Mylonakis, Bruno Scarpa, Massimiliano Russo, Maurizio Iengo, Marco de Vincentiis, Alessandro Martini and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 90% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Correlation between olfactory function, age, sex, and cognitive reserve index in the Italian population.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena CantoneDepartment of Neuroscience, ENT Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Andrea CiofaloOrgani di Senso Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Jan VodickaFaculty of Health Studies, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
Valentina IaconoDepartment of Neurosciences, Otolaryngology Section, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Ioannis MylonakisDepartment of Neurosciences, Otolaryngology Section, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Bruno ScarpaDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Massimiliano RussoDepartment of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Maurizio IengoDepartment of Neuroscience, ENT Section, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Marco de VincentiisOrgani di Senso Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro MartiniDepartment of Neurosciences, Otolaryngology Section, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Giancarlo OttavianoDepartment of Neurosciences, Otolaryngology Section, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. giancarlo.ottaviano@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2433-4761
University of Padua · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Pardubice · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although individuals categorize odors according to their pleasantness, experience may also influence odor perception-a phenomenon that partially explains why different populations perceive odors differently. Italy, which comprises 20 regions, is characterized by very different cultures. In the present study, we investigated for the first time how Italian regional differences can affect odor perception. 254 healthy volunteers coming from northern, central, southern Italy, and Sicily, one of the two major Italian islands, were recruited in Padua, Rome, Naples, and Syracuse, respectively. Olfactory function was tested with Sniffin' Sticks identification subtest. Subjects who had a score in the range within the mean identification value ± 1 SD, in accordance with the age classes identified in the literature, were asked to judge the odor pleasantness of 20 substances. The hedonic tone of the odorants was categorized as pleasant, neutral, unpleasant, and very unpleasant. Some odorants were appreciated more in northern Italy than in the other parts of the country, whereas others were appreciated more in the south and in Sicily than in the north. Unpleasant odorants were judged less unpleasant in central Italy. Some odorants such as strawberry and vanilla were perceived similarly in all the regional areas. Our study indicates that in Italy, hedonic perception of odorants differs probably in relation with genetic, cultural, and environmental factors. Further investigation is needed to delve deeper into the factors that influence the quality odor perception amongst humans.

Indexed as

OdorantsOlfactory PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansItalyMaleSicilySmellStatistics, NonparametricTrigeminal GanglionHedonismItalyOdorsRegional areasSmell

Identifiers

PMID28861603
OpenAlexW2751577946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.