ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2017
Direct oral anticoagulants: analysis of worldwide use and popularity using Google Trends.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of apixaban compared to rivaroxaban in acute VTE in the real world.Blood advances · 2019Pooled it
- Periprocedural Bridging in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review.The American journal of medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Continuation of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin during critical illness: bleeding and clinical outcomes in a multicenter ICU cohort.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Measurement of plasma direct oral anticoagulants concentrations in real-world clinical and laboratory settings on a 24/7 basis: a 10-year experience.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder drug search trends: a Scandinavian perspective.Acta neuropsychiatrica · 2025Article
- Role of a National Health Service Electronic Prescriptions Database in the Detection of Prescribing and Dispensing Issues and Adherence Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Optimizing warfarin dosing for patients with atrial fibrillation using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Compliance to perioperative anticoagulation protocols in elderly patients undergoing elective orthopedic procedures: a retrospective observational cohort study on 548 patients.Patient safety in surgery · 2023Article
- Evolving Trends in Consumption of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in 65 Countries/Regions from 2008 to 2019.Drugs · 2023Article
- Distinct pleiotropic effects of direct oral anticoagulants on cultured endothelial cells: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Use of preinjury antiplatelet and oral anticoagulant agents on outcomes following blunt trauma in an Asian population: a 1:2 propensity score matched study.International journal of burns and trauma · 2023Article
- Atraumatic splenic rupture in a patient treated with rivaroxaban: A case report and a narrative review.Clinical case reports · 2022Article
- Importance of attributes and willingness to pay for oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation in China: A discrete choice experiment.PLoS medicine · 2021Article
- Impact of anticoagulation and antiplatelet drugs on surgery rates and mortality in trauma patients.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Elderly people are inherently sensitive to the pharmacological activity of rivaroxaban: implications for DOAC prescribing.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Article
- Worldwide antipsychotic drug search intensities: pharmacoepidemological estimations based on Google Trends data.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Influence of Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Drug Use on Outcomes after Chronic Subdural Hematoma Drainage.Journal of neurotrauma · 2021Article
- Ureteroscopy in Patients Taking Anticoagulant or Antiplatelet Therapy: Practice Patterns and Outcomes in a Surgical Collaborative.The Journal of urology · 2021Article
- A retrospective study on the evaluation of the appropriateness of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.PloS one · 2021Article
- Barriers and facilitators to optimal oral anticoagulant management: a scoping review.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFour direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved for clinical use by many medicines regulatory agencies around the world. Due to increasing use of these drugs in routine practice, we planned an original study to investigate their worldwide diffusion using a popular Web-search engine.
methodsTwo electronic searches were performed using Google Trends, the former using the keywords "warfarin" AND "heparin" AND "fondaparinux", and the latter using the keywords "warfarin" AND "dabigatran" AND "rivaroxaban" AND "apixaban" AND "edoxaban", both using the search criterion "prescription drug". No language restriction was applied, and the searches were carried out from the first date available in Google Trends (January 1
resultsThe median Google Trends score of warfarin (i.e., 86) was consistently higher than that of heparin (54; P<0.001), fondaparinux (6; P<0.001), dabigatran (11; P<0.001), rivaroxaban (5; P<0.001), apixaban (1; P<0.001) and edoxaban (1; P<0.001). Specific analysis of the trends shows that the score of warfarin exhibits a highly significant decrease over time (r=-0.40; P<0.001), whilst that of heparin has remained virtually unchanged (r=0.12; P=0.127), and that of fondaparinux has marginally increased (r=0.16; P=0.038). As regards DOACs, the scores of these drugs significantly increased during the search period (dabigatran, r=0.79; rivaroxaban, r=0.99; apixaban, r=0.98; edoxaban, r=0.78; all P<0.001). When the analysis was limited to the past five years, the dabigatran score significantly decreased (r=-0.57; P<0.001), whereas that of the other DOACs exhibited an even sharper increase. Most Google searches for DOACs were performed in North America, central-eastern Europe and Australia.
conclusionsThe results of our analysis suggest that the popularity of DOACs is constantly increasing around the world, whereas that of warfarin has exhibited a constant and inexorable decline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.