ReviewFrontiers in medicine2017
Continuous Spinal Anesthesia for Obstetric Anesthesia and Analgesia.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of dexmedetomidine infusion during spinal anesthesia on hemodynamics and sedation.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2018Trial
- Continuous Spinal Anesthesia in Frail Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Hip and Knee Revision Surgery: Advantages, Indications, and Risk Management-A Single-Center Retrospective Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-guided femoral and sciatic nerve block as an option for below-knee amputation in an elderly patient: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Effects on newborns of applying bupivacaine combined with different doses of fentanyl for cesarean section.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Intrathecal catheter for severe low back pain during deep brain stimulation placement: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2021Article
- Continuous Spinal Anaesthesia for Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture in a Patient with Skeletal Dysplasia.Case reports in anesthesiology · 2021Article
- Accidental dural puncture-perioperative management.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2020Article
- The Effect of Sumatriptan, Theophylline, Pregabalin and Caffeine on Prevention of Headache Caused By Spinal Anaesthesia (PDPH): A Systematic Review.Journal of the West African College of SurgeonsReview
- Local anaesthetic resistance in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome undergoing caesarean section with continuous spinal anaesthesia.Anaesthesia reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread use of continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) in obstetrics has been slow because of the high risk for post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) associated with epidural needles and catheters. New advances in equipment and technique have not significantly overcome this disadvantage. However, CSA offers an alternative to epidural anesthesia in morbidly obese women, women with severe cardiac disease, and patients with prior spinal surgery. It should be strongly considered in parturients who receive an accidental dural puncture with a large bore needle, on the basis of recent work suggesting significant reduction in PDPH when intrathecal catheters are used. Small doses of drug can be administered and extension of labor analgesia for emergency cesarean delivery may occur more rapidly compared to continuous epidural techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.