Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28861278›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2017

Comparing structural and transcriptional drug networks reveals signatures of drug activity and toxicity in transcriptional responses.

Francesco Sirci, Francesco Napolitano, Sandra Pisonero-Vaquero, Diego Carrella, Diego L Medina, Diego di Bernardo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Drug Repurposing: A Leading Strategy for New Threats and Targets.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco SirciTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), System Biology and Bioinformatics lab. and High Content Screening facility, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli (NA), Italy.
Francesco Napolitano *Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), System Biology and Bioinformatics lab. and High Content Screening facility, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli (NA), Italy.
Sandra Pisonero-Vaquero *Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), System Biology and Bioinformatics lab. and High Content Screening facility, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli (NA), Italy.
Diego CarrellaTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), System Biology and Bioinformatics lab. and High Content Screening facility, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli (NA), Italy.
Diego L MedinaTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), System Biology and Bioinformatics lab. and High Content Screening facility, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli (NA), Italy.
Diego di BernardoTelethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine (TIGEM), System Biology and Bioinformatics lab. and High Content Screening facility, Via Campi Flegrei 34, 80078 Pozzuoli (NA), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1911-7407
Telethon Institute Of Genetics And Medicine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed an integrated analysis of drug chemical structures and drug-induced transcriptional responses. We demonstrated that a network representing three-dimensional structural similarities among 5452 compounds can be used to automatically group together drugs with similar scaffolds, physicochemical parameters and mode-of-action. We compared the structural network to a network representing transcriptional similarities among a subset of 1309 drugs for which transcriptional response were available in the Connectivity Map data set. Analysis of structurally similar, but transcriptionally different drugs sharing the same MOA enabled us to detect and remove weak and noisy transcriptional responses, greatly enhancing the reliability of transcription-based approaches to drug discovery and drug repositioning. Cardiac glycosides exhibited the strongest transcriptional responses with a significant induction of pathways related to epigenetic regulation, which suggests an epigenetic mechanism of action for these drugs. Drug classes with the weakest transcriptional responses tended to induce expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes, hinting at drug-induced drug resistance. Analysis of transcriptionally similar, but structurally different drugs with unrelated MOA, led us to the identification of a 'toxic' transcriptional signature indicative of lysosomal stress (lysosomotropism) and lipid accumulation (phospholipidosis) partially masking the target-specific transcriptional effects of these drugs. We found that this transcriptional signature is shared by 258 compounds and it is associated to the activation of the transcription factor TFEB, a master regulator of lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy. Finally, we built a predictive Random Forest model of these 258 compounds based on 128 physicochemical parameters, which should help in the early identification of potentially toxic drug candidates.

Identifiers

PMID28861278
PMCPMC5572457
OpenAlexW2745986812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.