Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28861241›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2017

Evaluation of an automated protocol for efficient and reliable DNA extraction of dietary samples.

Corinna Wallinger, Karin Staudacher, Daniela Sint, Bettina Thalinger, Johannes Oehm, Anita Juen, Michael Traugott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Corinna WallingerMountain Agriculture Research Unit Institute of Ecology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7153-9690
Karin StaudacherMountain Agriculture Research Unit Institute of Ecology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.
Daniela SintMountain Agriculture Research Unit Institute of Ecology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3387-4284
Bettina ThalingerMountain Agriculture Research Unit Institute of Ecology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9315-8648
Johannes OehmMountain Agriculture Research Unit Institute of Ecology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6914-5353
Anita JuenMountain Agriculture Research Unit Institute of Ecology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.
Michael TraugottMountain Agriculture Research Unit Institute of Ecology University of Innsbruck Innsbruck Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9719-5059
Universität Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular techniques have become an important tool to empirically assess feeding interactions. The increased usage of next-generation sequencing approaches has stressed the need of fast DNA extraction that does not compromise DNA quality. Dietary samples here pose a particular challenge, as these demand high-quality DNA extraction procedures for obtaining the minute quantities of short-fragmented food DNA. Automatic high-throughput procedures significantly decrease time and costs and allow for standardization of extracting total DNA. However, these approaches have not yet been evaluated for dietary samples. We tested the efficiency of an automatic DNA extraction platform and a traditional CTAB protocol, employing a variety of dietary samples including invertebrate whole-body extracts as well as invertebrate and vertebrate gut content samples and feces. Extraction efficacy was quantified using the proportions of successful PCR amplifications of both total and prey DNA, and cost was estimated in terms of time and material expense. For extraction of total DNA, the automated platform performed better for both invertebrate and vertebrate samples. This was also true for prey detection in vertebrate samples. For the dietary analysis in invertebrates, there is still room for improvement when using the high-throughput system for optimal DNA yields. Overall, the automated DNA extraction system turned out as a promising alternative to labor-intensive, low-throughput manual extraction methods such as CTAB. It is opening up the opportunity for an extensive use of this cost-efficient and innovative methodology at low contamination risk also in trophic ecology.

Indexed as

BioSprintcetyltrimethylammonium bromideDNA isolationmolecular gut content analysismolecular scatologytrophic interactions

Identifiers

PMID28861241
PMCPMC5574753
OpenAlexW2731034538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.