Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28861131›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2017

Unique Down to Our Microbes-Assessment of an Inquiry-Based Metagenomics Activity.

Thomas B Lentz, Laura E Ott, Sabrina D Robertson, Sarah C Windsor, Joshua B Kelley, Michael S Wollenberg, Robert R Dunn, Carlos C Goller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Illuminating the "black boxes" of microbiome sequencing.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbiomes for All.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thomas B LentzBiotechnology Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Laura E OttCollege of Natural and Mathematical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250.
Sabrina D RobertsonBiotechnology Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Sarah C WindsorNorth Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707.
Joshua B KelleyWashington and Lee University, Lexington, VA 24450.
Michael S WollenbergKalamazoo College, Kalamazoo, MI 49006.
Robert R DunnDepartment of Applied Ecology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Carlos C GollerBiotechnology Program, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.

Funding

STEM BUILD@UMBC: Student Training CoreTL4GM118989 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI LACOURSE, WILLIAM RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$8.5M
STEM BUILD@UMBC: Overall ComponentUL1GM118988 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI LACOURSE, WILLIAM RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$6.6M
STEM BUILD@UMBC: Research Enrichment CoreRL5GM118987 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI LACOURSE, WILLIAM RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS RL5 GM118987NIGMS NIH HHS TL4 GM118989NIGMS NIH HHS UL1 GM118988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomics is an important method for studying microbial life. However, undergraduate exposure to metagenomics is hindered by associated software, computing demands, and dataset access. In this inquiry-based activity designed for introductory life science majors and nonmajors, students perform an investigation of the bacterial communities inhabiting the human belly button and associated metagenomics data collected through a citizen science project and visualized using an open-access bioinformatics tool. The activity is designed for attainment of the following student learning outcomes: defining terms associated with metagenomics analyses, describing the biological impact of the microbiota on human health, formulating a hypothesis, analyzing and interpreting metagenomics data to compare microbiota, evaluating a specific hypothesis, and synthesizing a conceptual model as to why bacterial populations vary. This activity was implemented in six introductory biology and biotechnology courses across five institutions. Attainment of student learning outcomes was assessed through completion of a quiz and students' presentations of their findings. In presentations, students demonstrated their ability to develop novel hypotheses and analyze and interpret metagenomic data to evaluate their hypothesis. In quizzes, students demonstrated their ability to define key terms and describe the biological impact of the microbiota on human health. Student learning gains assessment also revealed that students perceived gains for all student learning outcomes. Collectively, our assessment demonstrates achievement of the learning outcomes and supports the utility of this inquiry-based activity to engage undergraduates in the scientific process via analyses of metagenomics datasets and associated exploration of a microbial community that lives on the human body.

Identifiers

PMID28861131
PMCPMC5576765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.