Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28861099›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

New Biotechnological Tools for the Genetic Improvement of Major Woody Fruit Species.

Cecilia Limera, Silvia Sabbadini, Jeremy B Sweet, Bruno Mezzetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Challenges and Opportunities Arising from Host-International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. The Promising Potential of Triploidy in Date Palm (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Focus on fruit crops.Plant physiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cecilia LimeraDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Silvia SabbadiniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.
Jeremy B SweetJ. T. Environmental Consultants LtdCambridge, United Kingdom.
Bruno MezzettiDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Università Politecnica delle MarcheAncona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The improvement of woody fruit species by traditional plant breeding techniques has several limitations mainly caused by their high degree of heterozygosity, the length of their juvenile phase and auto-incompatibility. The development of new biotechnological tools (NBTs), such as RNA interference (RNAi), trans-grafting, cisgenesis/intragenesis, and genome editing tools, like zinc-finger and CRISPR/Cas9, has introduced the possibility of more precise and faster genetic modifications of plants. This aspect is of particular importance for the introduction or modification of specific traits in woody fruit species while maintaining unchanged general characteristics of a selected cultivar. Moreover, some of these new tools give the possibility to obtain transgene-free modified fruit tree genomes, which should increase consumer's acceptance. Over the decades biotechnological tools have undergone rapid development and there is a continuous addition of new and valuable techniques for plant breeders. This makes it possible to create desirable woody fruit varieties in a fast and more efficient way to meet the demand for sustainable agricultural productivity. Although, NBTs have a common goal i.e., precise, fast, and efficient crop improvement, individually they are markedly different in approach and characteristics from each other. In this review we describe in detail their mechanisms and applications for the improvement of fruit trees and consider the relationship between these biotechnological tools and the EU biosafety regulations applied to the plants and products obtained through these techniques.

Indexed as

cisgenesis/intragenesisCrispr/Cas9EU biosafety regulationsgenome editingplant breedingRNA interference (RNAi)trans-grafting

Identifiers

PMID28861099
PMCPMC5559511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.