Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28860968›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2017

Differential Peripheral Proteomic Biosignature of Fluoxetine Response in a Mouse Model of Anxiety/Depression.

Indira Mendez-David, Céline Boursier, Valérie Domergue, Romain Colle, Bruno Falissard, Emmanuelle Corruble, Alain M Gardier, Jean-Philippe Guilloux, Denis J David

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neurobiological effects of phospholipidsNeurobiology of stress · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Indira Mendez-DavidCESP/UMR-S 1178, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Université Paris-SaclayChâtenay-Malabry, France.
Céline BoursierProteomic Facility, Institut Paris Saclay d'Innovation Thérapeutique (UMS IPSIT), Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-SaclayChâtenay-Malabry, France.
Valérie DomergueAnimal Facility, Institut Paris Saclay d'Innovation Thérapeutique (UMS IPSIT), Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-SaclayChâtenay-Malabry, France.
Romain ColleCESP/UMR 1178, Service de Psychiatrie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital BicêtreLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Bruno FalissardCESP/UMR 1178, Service de Psychiatrie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital BicêtreLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Emmanuelle CorrubleCESP/UMR 1178, Service de Psychiatrie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital BicêtreLe Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Alain M GardierCESP/UMR-S 1178, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Université Paris-SaclayChâtenay-Malabry, France.
Jean-Philippe GuillouxCESP/UMR-S 1178, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Université Paris-SaclayChâtenay-Malabry, France.
Denis J DavidCESP/UMR-S 1178, Université Paris-Sud, INSERM, Université Paris-SaclayChâtenay-Malabry, France.
Inserm · FRCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incorporation of peripheral biomarkers in the treatment of major depressive disorders (MDD) could improve the efficiency of treatments and increase remission rate. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) represent an attractive biological substrate allowing the identification of a drug response signature. Using a proteomic approach with high-resolution mass spectrometry, the present study aimed to identify a biosignature of antidepressant response (fluoxetine, a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor) in PBMCs in a mouse model of anxiety/depression. Following determination of an emotionality score, using complementary behavioral analysis of anxiety/depression across three different tests (Elevated Plus Maze, Novelty Suppressed Feeding, Splash Test), we showed that a 4-week corticosterone treatment (35 μg/ml, CORT model) in C57BL/6NTac male mice induced an anxiety/depressive-like behavior. Then, chronic fluoxetine treatment (18 mg/kg/day for 28 days in the drinking water) reduced corticosterone-induced increase in emotional behavior. However, among 46 fluoxetine-treated mice, only 30 of them presented a 50% decrease in emotionality score, defining fluoxetine responders (CORT/Flx-R). To determine a peripheral biological signature of fluoxetine response, proteomic analysis was performed from PBMCs isolated from the "most" affected corticosterone/vehicle (CORT/V), corticosterone/fluoxetine responders and non-responders (CORT/Flx-NR) animals. In comparison to CORT/V, a total of 263 proteins were differently expressed after fluoxetine exposure. Expression profile of these proteins showed a strong similarity between CORT/Flx-R and CORT/Flx-NR (R = 0.827,

Indexed as

antidepressantanxiety/depression micebiomarkerfluoxetinemajor depressive disordersmajor depressive episodeperipheral blood mononuclear cellresponder

Identifiers

PMID28860968
PMCPMC5561647
OpenAlexW2746255098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.