ArticleBMC clinical pathology2017
Accuracy of cervical cytology: comparison of diagnoses of 100 Pap smears read by four pathologists at three hospitals in Norway.
Article in BMC clinical pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnostic accuracy of macrophage colony-stimulating factor for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Estimating the age distribution of disease-causal HPV infection in women with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Denmark, Estonia, Norway, Slovenia, and Sweden: A modeling study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cervical Cytology: Opportunities and Limitations in Screening, Triage, and Diagnostic Support.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Koilocytosis in LSIL Cytology Has Limited Predictive Value for CIN2+ in HPV-Positive Women: Implications for Risk-Based Cytology Triage.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- HPV testing with 16/18 genotyping for risk stratification among women with normal cytology: a multicenter prospective cohort study from China.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Prospective Evaluation of Cytology, CINtecJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Digital Pathology with AI for Cervical Biopsies: Diagnostic Accuracy at the CIN2+ Threshold.Cancers · 2025Article
- Research trends of global artificial intelligence application in obstetrics and gynecology from 1999 to 2025: a bibliometric analysis based on web of science.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Article
- Impact of knowledge of human papillomavirus positivity on cervical cytology performance in Latin America.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- The promise of PD1/PDL1 targeted immunotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a game-changer for patients outcome?Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Article
- Evaluating PAX1/JAM3 methylation for triage in HPV 16/18-infected women.Clinical epigenetics · 2024Article
- Cervical cancer screening: efficacy of PAX1 and JAM3 methylation assay in the triage of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASC-US).BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Evaluating PAX1 methylation for cervical cancer screening triage in non-16/18 hrHPV-positive women.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence enables precision diagnosis of cervical cytology grades and cervical cancer.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Optimising cervical cancer screening during pregnancy: a study of liquid-based cytology and HPV DNA co-test.Epidemiology and infection · 2024Article
- Detection of cervical precancerous lesions and cancer by small-scale RT-qPCR analysis of oppositely deregulated mRNAs pairs in cytological smears.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A comparative analysis of cycle threshold (Ct) values from Cobas4800 and AmpFire HPV assay for triage of women with positive hrHPV results.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer can be prevented by early detection and treatment for precancerous lesions. Since 1995, there has been a national cervical cancer screening program in Norway, where women aged 25-69 years are recommended to take Pap smears every three years. There are 17 cytology laboratories covering a population of 5 million people. The detection rate of cervical abnormalities varies from laboratory to laboratory. We wanted to investigate the accuracy of cytology diagnoses by four different pathologists at three different hospitals in Norway.
methodsOne hundred Pap smears (20 Normal, 20 ASC-US, 20 LSIL, 20 ASC-H and 20 HSIL) screened at UNN in 2015 were evaluated by four pathologists at three hospitals in Norway. All patients were followed up through December 2016. Histologically confirmed high-grade dysplasia (CIN2+) was considered as study endpoint.
resultsThe number of Pap smears evaluated as abnormal (ASC-US+) by the four pathologists varied from 61 to 85. The number of high-grade cytology (ASC-H+) varied from 26 to 50. There was moderate agreement (weighted kappa 0.45-0.58) between the observers. There were 32 women with high-grade histology (CIN2+) in the follow-up, including 19 CIN2, 12 CIN3 and one squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Using high-grade cytology (ASC-H+) as cut-off, the sensitivity for CIN2+ varied from 68.8% to 93.8% (mean 77.4%) and specificity from 70.6% to 95.6% (mean 81.3%). The pathologist with the highest sensitivity for CIN2+ had the highest false positive rate and the lowest specificity (
conclusionsCervical cancer screening based on cytology has limited accuracy. The study revealed a moderate agreement between the observers, along with a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity. This might indicate that hospitals with high detection rates of cervical cytology have higher sensitivity for CIN2+ but lower specificity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.