Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28860850›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2017

A randomized, double-blind study of hydromorphone hydrochloride extended-release tablets versus oxycodone hydrochloride extended-release tablets for cancer pain: efficacy and safety in Japanese cancer patients (EXHEAL: a Phase III study of EXtended-release HydromorphonE for cAncer pain reLief).

Satoshi Inoue, Yoji Saito, Satoru Tsuneto, Etsuko Aruga, Azusa Ide, Yasuyuki Kakurai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oxycodone for cancer-related pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Hydromorphone for cancer pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Interpol review of controlled substances 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Satoshi InoueClinical Development Department, R&D Division, Daiichi Sankyo, Tokyo.
Yoji SaitoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Shimane.
Satoru TsunetoHuman Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto.
Etsuko ArugaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Tokyo.
Azusa IdeClinical Development Department, R&D Division, Daiichi Sankyo, Tokyo.
Yasuyuki KakuraiBiostatistics and Data Management Department, R&D Division, Daiichi Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Daiichi Sankyo (Germany) · DEDaiichi-Sankyo (Japan) · JPKyoto University · JPShimane University · JPTeikyo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Japan, there are limited options for switching opioid analgesics. Hydromorphone is an opioid analgesic that is routinely used instead of morphine for cancer pain; however, it is not yet available in Japan. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of hydromorphone (DS-7113b) extended-release tablets in opioid-naïve patients with cancer pain not relieved by non-opioid analgesics. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. A double-dummy method was used for blinding. Each randomized subject received either hydromorphone extended-release tablets plus placebo oxycodone hydrochloride extended-release tablets 4 mg/day (n=88) or placebo hydromorphone extended-release tablets plus oxycodone hydrochloride extended-release tablets 10 mg/day (n=93) orally for 7 days (once-daily dosing for hydromorphone and twice-daily dosing for oxycodone). The doses were adjusted as necessary. Efficacy was evaluated by change in visual analog scale (VAS) score from baseline to completion of treatment.

resultsThe between-group difference in least squares mean changes in VAS score from baseline to completion or discontinuation of treatment was -0.4 mm (95% CI -5.9 to 5 mm) by analysis of covariance where the baseline VAS score was used as a covariate. The upper limit of the 95% CI was below 10 mm, which was predefined as the noninferiority limit. This verified the noninferiority of hydromorphone tablets relative to oxycodone tablets. The incidence of adverse events was 80.7% (71 of 88) in the hydromorphone group and 83.7% (77 of 93) in the oxycodone group. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, somnolence, diarrhea, and constipation, most of which are commonly observed with opioid analgesics.

conclusionThe efficacy and safety of hydromorphone extended-release tablets were equivalent to those of the oxycodone extended-release formulation.

Indexed as

cancer paindouble-blind studyhydromorphoneoxycodonepalliative medicine

Identifiers

PMID28860850
PMCPMC5571837
OpenAlexW2745831774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.