Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28860763›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2017

Cytotoxicity induced by carbon nanotubes in experimental malignant glioma.

Samuel Romano-Feinholz, Alelí Salazar-Ramiro, Emilio Muñoz-Sandoval, Roxana Magaña-Maldonado, Norma Hernández Pedro, Edgar Rangel López, Alberto González Aguilar, Aurora Sánchez García, Julio Sotelo, Verónica Pérez de la Cruz and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Advancing brain immunotherapy through functional nanomaterials.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Nanosuspension Formulations of Daidzein: Preparation andTurkish journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Nanoscale Drug Delivery Systems in Glioblastoma.Nanoscale research letters · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Samuel Romano-Feinholz *Division of Neurosurgery.
Alelí Salazar-Ramiro *Neuroimmunology and Neuro-oncology Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery (NINN), Mexico City.
Emilio Muñoz-SandovalDivision of Advanced Materials, IPICYT, San Luis Potosí.
Roxana Magaña-MaldonadoNeuroimmunology and Neuro-oncology Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery (NINN), Mexico City.
Norma Hernández PedroExperimental Oncology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute of Mexico.
Edgar Rangel LópezExcitatory Aminoacids Laboratory.
Alberto González AguilarDivision of Neurosurgery.
Aurora Sánchez GarcíaPathology Laboratory.
Julio SoteloNeuroimmunology and Neuro-oncology Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery (NINN), Mexico City.
Verónica Pérez de la CruzNeurochemistry Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery (NINN), Mexico City, Mexico.
Benjamín PinedaNeuroimmunology and Neuro-oncology Unit, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery (NINN), Mexico City.
Institute of Neuroimmunology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKAmino Up (Japan) · JPInstitute for Scientific and Technological Research · MXNational Cancer Institute · UAVietnam National Children's Hospital · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite multiple advances in the diagnosis of brain tumors, there is no effective treatment for glioblastoma. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), which were previously used as a diagnostic and drug delivery tool, have now been explored as a possible therapy against neoplasms. However, although the toxicity profile of nanotubes is dependent on the physicochemical characteristics of specific particles, there are no studies exploring how the effectivity of the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) is affected by different methods of production. In this study, we characterize the structure and biocompatibility of four different types of MWCNTs in rat astrocytes and in RG2 glioma cells as well as the induction of cell lysis and possible additive effect of the combination of MWCNTs with temozolomide. We used undoped MWCNTs (labeled simply as MWCNTs) and nitrogen-doped MWCNTs (labeled as N-MWCNTs). The average diameter of both pristine MWCNTs and pristine N-MWCNTs was ~22 and ~35 nm, respectively. In vitro and in vivo results suggested that these CNTs can be used as adjuvant therapy along with the standard treatment to increase the survival of rats implanted with malignant glioma.

Indexed as

Nanotubes, CarbonAnimalsApoptosisAstrocytesBrain NeoplasmsCell DeathCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalGliomaNeoplasms, ExperimentalRatsNanotubes, Carboncarbon nanotubesglioblastoma therapymalignant gliomatemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID28860763
PMCPMC5573058
OpenAlexW2747141656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.