Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28860754›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2017

Nanomedicine applications in the treatment of breast cancer: current state of the art.

Di Wu, Mengjie Si, Hui-Yi Xue, Ho-Lun Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Di WuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mengjie SiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Hui-Yi XueDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ho-Lun WongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Hybrid nanotechnology to target metastatic advanced prostate cancerR01CA168917 · NCI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI WONG, HO-LUN · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignant disease in women worldwide, but the current drug therapy is far from optimal as indicated by the high death rate of breast cancer patients. Nanomedicine is a promising alternative for breast cancer treatment. Nanomedicine products such as Doxil

Indexed as

Albumin-Bound PaclitaxelAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDoxorubicinDrug Delivery SystemsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNanomedicineNeoplastic Stem CellsPolyethylene GlycolsTumor MicroenvironmentAlbumin-Bound PaclitaxelAntineoplastic AgentsDoxorubicinERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinasesliposomal doxorubicinPolyethylene Glycolsbreast cancerdrug resistancedrug therapynanomedicinetargeted deliverytumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID28860754
PMCPMC5566389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.