Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28860696›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2017

Telemedicine for diabetic retinopathy screening using an ultra-widefield fundus camera.

Nazimul Hussain, Maryam Edraki, Rima Tahhan, Nishanth Sanalkumar, Sami Kenz, Nagwa Khalil Akasha, Brian Mtemererwa, Nahed Mohammed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Wide field of view handheld smart fundus camera for telemedicine applications.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinic-based ultra-wide field retinal imaging in a pediatric population.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Peripheral retinal lesions in diabetic retinopathy on ultra-widefield imaging.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Nazimul HussainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Al Zahra Hospital, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Maryam EdrakiDepartment of Endocrinology, Al Zahra Hospital, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Rima TahhanDepartment of Endocrinology, Al Zahra Hospital, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Nishanth SanalkumarDepartment of Endocrinology, Al Zahra Hospital, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Sami KenzDepartment of Endocrinology, Al Zahra Hospital, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Nagwa Khalil AkashaDepartment of Endocrinology, Al Zahra Hospital, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Brian MtemererwaDepartment of Endocrinology, Al Zahra Hospital, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Nahed MohammedDepartment of Endocrinology, Al Zahra Hospital, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Jahra Hospital · KW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTelemedicine reporting of diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening using ultra-widefield (UWF) fundus camera. MATERIALS AND

methodsCross-sectional study of diabetic patients who visited the endocrinology department of a private multi-specialty hospital in United Arab Emirates between April 2015 and January 2017 who underwent UWF fundus imaging. Fundus pictures are then accessed at the Retina Clinic in the Department of Ophthalmology. Primary outcome measure was incidence of any form of DR detected. The secondary outcome measure was failure to take good image and inability to grade.

resultsA total of 1,024 diabetic individuals were screened for DR from April 2015 to January 2017 in the department of Endocrinology. Rate of DR was 9.27%; 165 eyes of 95 individuals were diagnosed to have some form of DR. Mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR) was seen in 114 of 165 eyes (69.09%), moderate NPDR in 32 eyes (19.39%), severe NPDR in six eyes (3.64%), and proliferative DR (PDR) in 13 eyes (7.88%). The secondary outcome measure of poor image acquisition was seen in one individual who had an image acquired in one eye that could not be graded due to bad picture quality.

conclusionsThe present study has shown the effectiveness of DR screening using UWF fundus camera. It has shown the effectiveness of trained nursing personnel taking fundus images. This model can be replicated in any private multi-specialty hospital and reduce the burden of DR screening in the retina clinic and enhance early detection of treatable DR.

Indexed as

diabetic retinopathy screeningtelemedicineultra-widefield camera

Identifiers

PMID28860696
PMCPMC5565372
OpenAlexW2749394804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.