ArticleScientific reports2017
Optimal achieved blood pressure for patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic impact of systolic blood pressure and antithrombotic strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease: a post-hoc analysis of the AFIRE trial.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Trial
- Determination of optimal on-treatment diastolic blood pressure range using automated measurements in subjects with cardiovascular disease-Analysis of a SPRINT trial subpopulation.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2019Trial
- Perioperative Blood Pressure Optimization to Improve Outcomes in Orthopedic Patients: A Clinical Review.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Review
- Change in pulse pressure and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: The CLIDAS study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- Optimal blood pressure for patients with end-stage renal disease following coronary interventions.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Article
- Potential impacts of high-sensitivity creatine kinase-MB on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with stable coronary heart disease.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The prognostic significance of heart-type fatty acid binding protein in patients with stable coronary heart disease.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the ideal achieved blood pressure (BP) in ethnic Chinese patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in Taiwan. A total of 2,045 patients (age 63.5 ± 11.9 years, 1,722 male [84.2%]) with stable CAD who had undergone percutaneous coronary interventions were enrolled. The achieved systolic BP was 130.6 ± 17.7 mmHg and diastolic BP was 74.9 ± 12.0 mmHg. In 12 months, patients with systolic BP < 120 mmHg and systolic BP ≥ 160 mmHg had increased risk of total cardiovascular events when compared to those with systolic BP 120-139 mmHg. In 24 months, patients with systolic BP < 120 mmHg and systolic BP ≥ 160 mmHg had increased risk of total cardiovascular events when compared to those with systolic BP 120-139 mmHg; patients with diastolic BP < 70 mmHg had increased risk of total cardiovascular events when compared to those with diastolic BP 70-79 mmHg. In conclusion, systolic BP < 120 mmHg and ≥160 mmHg or diastolic BP < 70 mmHg is associated with increased cardiovascular events, supporting that the optimal BP control should also be justified for stable CAD in non-western cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.