Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28860633›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A CDC42-centered signaling unit is a dominant positive regulator of endothelial integrity.

J Amado-Azevedo, N R Reinhard, J van Bezu, R X de Menezes, V W van Beusechem, G P van Nieuw Amerongen, V W M van Hinsbergh, P L Hordijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fixing the GAP: The role of RhoGAPs in cancer.European journal of cell biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Neuroinflammation During RNA Viral Infections.Annual review of immunology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J Amado-AzevedoDepartment of Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6247-4880
N R ReinhardDepartment of Molecular Cytology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, van Leeuwenhoek Centre for Advanced Microscopy, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J van BezuDepartment of Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R X de MenezesDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
V W van BeusechemDepartment of Medical Oncology, RNA Interference Functional Oncogenomics Laboratory, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G P van Nieuw AmerongenDepartment of Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
V W M van HinsberghDepartment of Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P L HordijkDepartment of Physiology, Institute for Cardiovascular Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.hordijk@vumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endothelial barrier function is carefully controlled to protect tissues from edema and damage inflicted by extravasated leukocytes. RhoGTPases, in conjunction with myriad regulatory proteins, exert both positive and negative effects on the endothelial barrier integrity. Precise knowledge about the relevant mechanisms is currently fragmented and we therefore performed a comprehensive analysis of endothelial barrier regulation by RhoGTPases and their regulators. Combining RNAi with electrical impedance measurements we quantified the relevance of 270 Rho-associated genes for endothelial barrier function. Statistical analysis identified 10 targets of which six promoted- and four reduced endothelial barrier function upon downregulation. We analyzed in more detail two of these which were not previously identified as regulators of endothelial integrity. We found that the Rac1-GEF (Guanine nucleotide Exchange Factor) TIAM2 is a positive regulator and the Cdc42(Rac1)-GAP (GTPase-Activating Protein) SYDE1 is a negative regulator of the endothelial barrier function. Finally, we found that the GAP SYDE1 is part of a Cdc42-centered signaling unit, also comprising the Cdc42-GEF FARP1 and the Cdc42 effector PAK7 which controls the integrity of the endothelial barrier. In conclusion, using a siRNA-based screen, we identified new regulators of barrier function and found that Cdc42 is a dominant positive regulator of endothelial integrity.

Indexed as

Signal Transductioncdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinDown-RegulationGTPase-Activating ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cellsp21-Activated KinasesRho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factorscdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCDC42 protein, humanFARP1 protein, humanGTPase-Activating ProteinsGuanine Nucleotide Exchange Factorsp21-Activated KinasesPAK1 protein, humanRho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange FactorsSYDE1 protein, humanTIAM2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28860633
PMCPMC5579287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.