Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28860603›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Response of soil microbial community to application of biochar in cotton soils with different continuous cropping years.

Guangming Han, Jiayang Lan, Quanqiu Chen, Cui Yu, Shu Bie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Effects of multi-resistantFrontiers in microbiomes · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Differential effects of cow dung and its biochar onFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Evaluating Slow Pyrolysis ofTheScientificWorldJournal · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Maize (Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of different biochars amendment on soil biological indicators in a calcareous soil.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guangming HanIndustrial Crops Institute of Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Changjiang River, Wuhan, 430064, China. mrhan888@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3825-5634
Jiayang LanIndustrial Crops Institute of Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Changjiang River, Wuhan, 430064, China. 18986216860@163.com.
Quanqiu ChenIndustrial Crops Institute of Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Changjiang River, Wuhan, 430064, China.
Cui YuIndustrial Crops Institute of Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Changjiang River, Wuhan, 430064, China.
Shu BieIndustrial Crops Institute of Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key laboratory of Cotton Biology and Breeding in the Middle Reaches of the Changjiang River, Wuhan, 430064, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial community in soils of cotton that have continuously been cropped for 2 years, 6 years, 11 years and 14 years and treated with biochar (B0, 0 t·ha

Indexed as

BacteriaCharcoalCrop ProductionDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalGossypiumHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrobiotaPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASoil MicrobiologybiocharCharcoalDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID28860603
PMCPMC5578980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.