Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28860427›Full record

ArticleJournal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions2017

Feasibility and acceptability of using jumping mechanography to detect early components of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older women.

K Hannam, A Hartley, E M Clark, A Aihie Sayer, J H Tobias, C L Gregson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Jumping mechanography reference data in Canadian children and adolescents aged 6 to 20 years.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Longitudinal changes in muscle power compared to muscle strength and mass.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lean mass and lower limb muscle function in relation to hip strength, geometry and fracture risk indices in community-dwelling older women.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Could bioelectric impedance spectroscopy (BIS) measured appendicular intracellular water serve as a lean mass measurement in sarcopenia definitions? A pilot study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

K HannamMusculoskeletal Research Unit,Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
A Hartley
E M Clark
A Aihie Sayer
J H Tobias
C L Gregson
Newcastle Hospitals - Campus for Ageing and Vitality · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the feasibility and acceptability of using peak power and force, measured by jumping mechanography (JM), to detect early age-related features of sarcopenia in older women.

methodsCommunity-dwelling women aged 71-87 years were recruited into this cross-sectional study. Physical function tests comprised the short physical performance battery (SPPB), grip strength and, if SPPB score≥6, JM. JM measured peak weight-adjusted power and force from two-footed jumps and one-legged hops respectively. Questionnaires assessed acceptability.

results463 women were recruited; 37(8%) with SPPB⟨6 were ineligible for JM. Of 426 remaining, 359(84%) were able to perform ≥1 valid two-footed jump, 300(70%) completed ≥1 valid one-legged hop. No adverse events occurred. Only 14% reported discomfort. Discomfort related to JM performance, with inverse associations with both power and force (p⟨0.01). Peak power and force respectively explained 8% and 10% of variance in SPPB score (13% combined); only peak power explained additional variance in grip strength (17%).

conclusionsPeak power and force explained a significant, but limited, proportion of variance in SPPB and grip strength. JM represents a safe and acceptable clinical tool for evaluating lower-limb muscle power and force in older women, detecting distinct components of muscle function, and possibly sarcopenia, compared to those evaluated by more established measures.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationAccelerometryAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMuscle StrengthSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID28860427
PMCPMC5601270
OpenAlexW2762806600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.