ArticleMicrobiome2017
Learning Microbial Community Structures with Supervised and Unsupervised Non-negative Matrix Factorization.
Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond just correlation: causal machine learning for the microbiome, from prediction to health policy with econometric tools.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Pooled it
- Decoding the microbiome: artificial intelligence-targeted gut microenvironment breakthroughs in personalized cancer therapy.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Enhancing the understanding of environmental microbiomes through topic modeling: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.Environmental microbiome · 2026Article
- Data-driven enterosignatures link gut microbiome reorganization to heat stress responses in lactating sows.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Detecting signatures underlying the composition of biological data.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- NMFProfiler: a multi-omics integration method for samples stratified in groups.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Neonatal gut microbiota stratification and identification of SCFA-associated microbial subgroups using unsupervised clustering and machine learning classification.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Vulnerability of Arctic Ocean microbial eukaryotes to sea ice loss.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genome-Scale Metabolic Models in Fungal Pathogens: Past, Present, and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Cuproptosis-Mediated Patterns Characterized by Distinct Tumor Microenvironment and Predicted the Immunotherapy Response for Gastric Cancer.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Bayesian biclustering for microbial metagenomic sequencing data via multinomial matrix factorization.Biostatistics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Review
- Detecting Genetic Variation of ColonizingFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- mbImpute: an accurate and robust imputation method for microbiome data.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization using clinical information for microbial communities.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- Applications of Machine Learning in Human Microbiome Studies: A Review on Feature Selection, Biomarker Identification, Disease Prediction and Treatment.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Key Technologies for Progressing Discovery of Microbiome-Based Medicines.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Literature on Applied Machine Learning in Metagenomic Classification: A Scoping Review.Biology · 2020Article
- Revealing the microbial assemblage structure in the human gut microbiome using latent Dirichlet allocation.Microbiome · 2020Article
- Prediction of microbial communities for urban metagenomics using neural network approach.Human genomics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLearning the structure of microbial communities is critical in understanding the different community structures and functions of microbes in distinct individuals. We view microbial communities as consisting of many subcommunities which are formed by certain groups of microbes functionally dependent on each other. The focus of this paper is on methods for extracting the subcommunities from the data, in particular Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF). Our methods can be applied to both OTU data and functional metagenomic data. We apply the existing unsupervised NMF method and also develop a new supervised NMF method for extracting interpretable information from classification problems.
resultsThe relevance of the subcommunities identified by NMF is demonstrated by their excellent performance for classification. Through three data examples, we demonstrate how to interpret the features identified by NMF to draw meaningful biological conclusions and discover hitherto unidentified patterns in the data. Comparing whole metagenomes of various mammals, (Muegge et al., Science 332:970-974, 2011), the biosynthesis of macrolides pathway is found in hindgut-fermenting herbivores, but not carnivores. This is consistent with results in veterinary science that macrolides should not be given to non-ruminant herbivores. For time series microbiome data from various body sites (Caporaso et al., Genome Biol 12:50, 2011), a shift in the microbial communities is identified for one individual. The shift occurs at around the same time in the tongue and gut microbiomes, indicating that the shift is a genuine biological trait, rather than an artefact of the method. For whole metagenome data from IBD patients and healthy controls (Qin et al., Nature 464:59-65, 2010), we identify differences in a number of pathways (some known, others new).
conclusionsNMF is a powerful tool for identifying the key features of microbial communities. These identified features can not only be used to perform difficult classification problems with a high degree of accuracy, they are also very interpretable and can lead to important biological insights into the structure of the communities. In addition, NMF is a dimension-reduction method (similar to PCA) in that it reduces the extremely complex microbial data into a low-dimensional representation, allowing a number of analyses to be performed more easily-for example, searching for temporal patterns in the microbiome. When we are interested in the differences between the structures of two groups of communities, supervised NMF provides a better way to do this, while retaining all the advantages of NMF-e.g. interpretability and a simple biological intuition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.