ReviewThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2017
Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review.
Review in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A realist review of which advocacy interventions work for which abused women under what circumstances.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Understanding workplace peer support among healthcare assistants providing palliative and end-of-life care at home: A realist review.Palliative medicine · 2026Review
- Ethics of Antibiotic Course Duration: Shorter is Better.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2026Article
- Contextual Determinants of Clinical Pharmacists' Contributions to Team-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship in Jordanian Hospitals: A Realist-Informed Qualitative Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness of Small Group Education on Improving Antibiotic Prescribing in General Practice: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mental health placements for health and social care students: A realist synthesis.Medical education · 2026Review
- Frequency of intravenous-to-oral antibiotic switch in VA hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2026Article
- Feeling the Vibes: An Investigation Into Resident Antibiotic Prescribing Practices.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- A systematic review of antimicrobial stewardship education for undergraduate students in medicine, nursing, pharmacy, dentistry, veterinary science and midwifery using COM-B framework.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Strategies to improve antimicrobial stewardship in surgery: insights from an ethnographic study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Peer effects on appropriate antibiotic prescribing within a patient-sharing physician network in China.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Development and assessment of an online communication skills course to optimise antibiotic prescribing for children in primary care.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Article
- Realist analysis of qualitative data in health professions education research.Medical education · 2025Review
- Article
- A realist evaluation to explain and understand the role of paramedics in primary care.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- A Behavioral Analysis of Factors That Influence Antibiotic Prescribing in Hospitals: A Metasynthesis of Reviews.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Review
- Designed for simplicity, used for complexity: The systemic pressures shaping walk-in clinic practices and outcomes.PloS one · 2025Article
- A realist review of medication optimisation of community dwelling service users with serious mental illness.BMJ quality & safety · 2024Review
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance has led to widespread implementation of interventions for appropriate prescribing. However, such interventions are often adopted without an adequate understanding of the challenges facing doctors-in-training as key prescribers. Methods: The review followed a realist, theory-driven approach to synthesizing qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods literature. Consistent with realist review quality standards, articles retrieved from electronic databases were systematically screened and analysed to elicit explanations of antimicrobial prescribing behaviours. These explanations were consolidated into a programme theory drawing on social science and learning theory, and shaped though input from patients and practitioners. Results: By synthesizing data from 131 articles, the review highlights the complex social and professional dynamics underlying antimicrobial prescribing decisions of doctors-in-training. The analysis shows how doctors-in-training often operate within challenging contexts (hierarchical relationships, powerful prescribing norms, unclear roles and responsibilities, implicit expectations about knowledge levels, uncertainty about application of knowledge in practice) where they prioritize particular responses (fear of criticism and individual responsibility, managing one's reputation and position in the team, appearing competent). These complex dynamics explain how and why doctors-in-training decide to: (i) follow senior clinicians' prescribing habits; (ii) take (or not) into account prescribing aids, advice from other health professionals or patient expectations; and (iii) ask questions or challenge decisions. This increased understanding allows for targeted tailoring, design and implementation of antimicrobial prescribing interventions. Conclusions: This review contributes to a better understanding of how antimicrobial prescribing interventions for doctors-in-training can be embedded more successfully in the hierarchical and inter-professional dynamics of different healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.