Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28859366›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2017

Variation by stage in the effects of prediagnosis weight loss on mortality in a prospective cohort of esophageal cancer patients.

S Shen, J L Araujo, N K Altorki, J R Sonett, A Rodriguez, K Sungur-Stasik, C F Spinelli, A I Neugut, J A Abrams

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cachexia is Prevalent in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Associated With Worse Prognosis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S ShenDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center.
J L AraujoVeterans' Administration New York Harbor Healthcare System, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
N K AltorkiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York.
J R SonettThoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center.
A RodriguezDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center.
K Sungur-StasikThoracic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center.
C F SpinelliDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York.
A I NeugutDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center.
J A AbramsDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USCornell University · USVA NY Harbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

Risk factors for site-specific metastasis in esophageal cancerK07CA132892 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ABRAMS, JULIAN · 2008 to 2012
$777k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA132892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cachexia is increasingly recognized as a poor prognostic marker for various tumor types. Weight loss in esophageal cancer is multifactorial, as patients with bulky tumors also have reduced ability to eat. We aimed to investigate the relationship between prediagnosis weight loss and mortality in esophageal cancer and to determine whether these associations vary with tumor stage. We conducted a prospective cohort study of esophageal cancer patients at two tertiary centers. We recorded baseline patient characteristics including medications, smoking, body mass index, and weight loss in the year prior to diagnosis, and collected data on treatment and outcomes. We used Cox regression modeling to determine the associations between percent weight loss and outcomes. The main outcome of interest was all-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were esophageal cancer-specific mortality and development of metastases. We enrolled 134 subjects, the majority of whom had adenocarcinoma (82.1%); median percent weight loss was 4.7% (IQR: 0%-10.9%). Increasing percent weight loss was not associated with all-cause mortality (ptrend = 0.36). However, there was evidence of significant interaction by tumor stage (p = 0.02). There was a strong and significant association between prediagnosis weight loss and mortality in patients with T stages 1 or 2 (adjusted HR 8.26 for highest versus lowest tertile, 95%CI 1.11-61.5, ptrend = 0.03) but not for T stages 3 or 4 (ptrend = 0.32). Body mass index one year prior to diagnosis was not associated with mortality. Prediagnosis weight loss was associated with increased all-cause mortality only in patients with early stage esophageal cancer. This suggests that tumor-related cachexia can occur early in esophageal cancer and represents a poor prognostic marker.

Indexed as

Weight LossAgedBody Mass IndexCachexiaEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProspective Studiesbody mass indexcachexiaesophageal neoplasmsweight loss

Identifiers

PMID28859366
PMCPMC6036662
OpenAlexW2738657299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.